HARKESH MANUJA
Mewa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Rajbir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging previous judgments on possession and execution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the validity of sales agreements. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's findings on the execution and witness testimony. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. assessment of evidence and dismissal of appeal. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final disposition of pending applications. (Para 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.
In the present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 23.09.2019 and 19.07.2022 passed by the Courts below whereby, a suit for possession by way of specific performance besides seeking declaration as well as permanent injunction, filed at the instance of respondent No.1-plaintiff has been decreed.
2. Briefly stating, based on an agreement to sell dated 27.09.2012, respondent No.1-plaintiff filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance regarding land measuring 2 Kanals and 16 marlas, situated in the revenue estate of village Fazilpur Badli, Tehsil Farrukh Nagar, District Gurugram. It was further prayed that appellant-defendant No.2 be restrained from alienating the suit property besides seeking declaration qua sale deed dated 30.10.2012 executed by responde
The validity of an agreement to sell is determined by credible testimonies supporting its execution; familial relationships do not alone discredit evidence in property transactions.
The court ruled that defendants cannot sell land they do not own and upheld the validity of the agreement for the remaining land.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.