SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1987

HARKESH MANUJA
Gurdip Singh (Since Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Pal Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate; For the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral)

By way of present appeal, challenge has been made to the judgment and decree dated 02.07.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Faridkot as well as judgment and decree dated 24.01.2023 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Faridkot, thereby, decreeing the suit for possession by way of specific performance filed at the instance of respondents-plaintiffs.

2. Briefly stating, the facts are that respondent No.3 entered into an agreement to sell dated 16.12.2004, in favour of respondents No.1 and 2 qua sale of the property in question with 20.05.2005 being the target date. As per the facts pleaded in the plaint, earnest money of Rs.1.5 lakh was paid to the vendor, however, in the meanwhile even before the target date, the vendor executed sale deed dated 20.12.2004 in favour of the present appellants, which was registered on 22.12.2004. Faced with this, respondents No.1 and 2 filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 16.12.2004, besides even seeking declaration qua the sale deed dated 20.12.2004 executed by respondent No.3 in favour of the present appellants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top