Back
HARSH BUNGER
Sadhvi Govind Bharti – Appellant
Versus
Shamsher Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. loan transaction leading to cheque dishonor (Para 2 , 8) |
| 2. trial court's findings based on evidence (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. parameters for interfering with acquittal judgement (Para 11 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 4. insufficient merit for appeal dismissal (Para 16 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Harsh Bunger, J. (Oral)
CRM-20082-2019
This is an application under Section 391 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for placing on record additional evidence of documents i.e. cross-examination statement of CW1 as Annexure A-1, Cheque bearing No.000233 dated 05.03.2017 as Annexure A-2, bank statement of complainant/appellant from 08.02.2017 to 12.04.2019 as Annexure A-3.
Criminal Misc. Application is allowed, as prayed for and Annexures A-1 to A-3, are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
CRM-20081-2019
This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 41 days in filing the accompanying application for grant of leave to file appeal.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 41 days in filing the accompanying application for grant of leave to file appeal is condoned.
Criminal Misc. Application stands disposed of accordingly.
CRM-A-1258
Point of Law : Presumption Under Section 139 is a rebuttable presumption and the onus is on the accused to raise the probable defence. The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of p....
Point of law : Presumption Under Section 139 is a rebuttable presumption and the onus is on the accused to raise the probable defence. The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
