JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Kaushalya Devi alias Kushaliya Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks family pension rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. disciplinary action post-retirement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for pension entitlement. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's dissection of impugned order. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. right to pension as human right. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. pension not a bounty; it's a right. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. court sets aside impugned order. (Para 23) |
| 8. order for benefits payment and costs. (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. (Oral)
The present is a petition which has been filed by a widow, who is stated to be bed-ridden and has been running from pillar to post to seek justice. It is a second round of litigation by a widow for seeking the family pension which is not only a Statutory Right but also a Constitutional Right under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India which provides that nobody shall be deprived of his property except by the authority of law. Right to property has also been held to be a Human Right by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Factual Matrix:-
2. The facts of the present case are that the husband of the petitioner, namely, Sh. Gurmail Singh was working as Junior Scale Stenographer i
Amarjit Singh v. State of Punjab
D.S. Nakara v. Union of India (1983) 1 SCC 305
Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab
Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Deoki Nandan Prasad v. State of Bihar [1971] Su. S.C.R. 634 : 1971 (2) SCC 330
Dr. Uma Agrawal v. State of U.P.
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Haryana v. Mukesh Kumar
State of Jharkhand v. Jitendra Kumar Srivastava
State of Kerala v. M. Padmanabhan Nair
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ranojirao Shinde
Tukaram Kana Joshi through Power of Attorney Holder v. M.I.D.C.
Pension is a valuable right protected under Article 300A of the Constitution, and cannot be denied without due process. Recovery from a deceased employee's benefits is unlawful without established li....
non-payment of leave salary and pension to retired employees is deprivation of a citizen in right to property. Such deprivation is violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 and Cons....
Pension rights are vested and cannot be arbitrarily denied; disciplinary actions post-retirement must adhere to statutory limits prohibiting proceedings for incidents beyond four years.
Pension and gratuity cannot be withheld without proper proceedings and findings of misconduct; Rule 43(c) requires adherence to principles of natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.