IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
Rajesh Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-25588 of 2024
Decided On : 24-05-2024
JUDGMENT
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral)
The prayer in the present petition under Section 439 Cr.PC is for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No.176 dated 28.11.2022 under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Anaj Mandi, Patiala, District Patiala.
2. The brief facts of the case are that Rajesh Kumar (petitioner) came to be apprehended with 920 intoxicating capsules.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act have not been complied with in their proper perspective. No independent witness was joined at the time of search and seizure. As he was a first-time offender, in custody since 28.11.2022 and none of the 15 prosecution witnesses had been examined so far, the trial of the present case was not likely to be concluded anytime soon. Therefore, the petitioner was entitled to the concession of bail in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan v. The State of West Bengal, SLP (Crl.) Nos.5769/2022 arising out of judgment and order dated 04.05.2022 in CRM(NDPS) No.442/2022, decided on 01.08.2022 and Hasanujjaman & others v. The State of West Bengal, SLP (Crl.) No.(s) 3221/2023 arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29.11.2022 in CRM (NDPS) No.1323/2022, decided on 04.05.2023.
4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel contends that commercial quantity of contraband has been recovered from the petitioner. Therefore, in view of the bar contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the petitioner is not entitled to the grant of bail. He, however, concedes that the petitioner was a first time offender, in custody since 28.11.2022 and none of the 15 prosecution witnesses had been examined.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan v. The State of West Bengal SLP (Crl.) Nos.5769/2022 Decided on 01.08.2022 held as under:-
"As per the office report dated 29.07.2022, copy of the show cause notice along with Special Leave Petition was supplied to the Standing Counsel for the State of West Bengal and separate notice has been served on the State also. However, no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
The petitioner seeks enlargement on bail in F.I.R. No. 612 of 2020 dated 17.10.2020 filed under Section 21(c) and 37 of the NDPS 2 Act, registered at Police Station Bongaon, West Bengal.
During the course of the hearing, we are informed that the petitioner has undergone custody for a period of 01 year and 07 months as on 09.06.2022. The trial is at a preliminary stage, as only one witness has been examined. The petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents.
Taking into consideration the period of sentence undergone by the petitioner and all the attending circumstances but without expressing any views in the merits of the case, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
The petitioner is accordingly, directed to be released on bail subject to him furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
The Special Leave Petition is disposed of on the afore-stated terms.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of."
7. In Hasanujjaman & others v. The State of West Bengal, SLP (Crl.) No.(s).3221/2023, decided on 04.05.2023, held as under:-
"1. There are three petitioners in this Special Leave Petition, who were accused of committing an offence under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'NDPS Act') in FIR No.18/2022, dated 09.01.2022, registered at Police Station Islampur, District Murshidabad, West Bengal.
2. The allegations are that when the police party intercepted the petitioners along with another person riding on two motorcycles, they were found in possession of codeine phosphate in a consignment of phensedyl bottles loaded in two nylon bags. During the search
AI
The court granted bail to a first-time offender under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial and the lack of compliance with mandatory provisions.
The court can relax statutory bail conditions under the NDPS Act for first-time offenders awaiting trial to uphold the right to a speedy trial.
The court may grant bail under the NDPS Act even when Section 37 applies, considering the right to a speedy trial and circumstances of first-time offenders.
The court granted bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial and the significance of the duration of custody and absence of criminal antecedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.