SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2402

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
Lasky Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
Ravi Jain & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-50575 of 2023 IN /AND CRR-2764 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 04-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sahil Soi, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Bansal, Advocate, for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab, for Respondent No.2-State.

The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is compoundable, allowing for acquittal upon mutual settlement between parties.

Headnote:(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 320 and 401 - Revision petition against conviction under Section 138 dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge - Accused failed to pay cheque amount, leading to conviction and sentence - Parties settled dispute amicably, allowing for compounding of the offence - Court acquitted the accused due to settlement. (Paras 1, 5, 11)

(B) Compounding of Offences - Offence under Section 138 is compoundable as per Section 147 of the NI Act - Settlement can occur during trial or in revision - Composition leads to acquittal of the accused. (Paras 8, 9)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral)

The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 19.09.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, vide which the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.03.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar, has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant had been visiting the accused who was running the business under the name and style of Harris Dyers and Dry Cleaners. As the accused took Rs. 12,00,000/- from the complainant on 10.04.2014 and agreed to return part payment of the said amount in the month of May 2014 and the remaining amount in the month of September 2014. In the month of May 2014, the accused failed to return the part payment but he executed an undertaking on 30.05.2014 wherein he confirmed his undertaking to return the amount upto September, 2014 and issued three post dated cheques in favour of the complainant including a cheque No.569423 dated 16.09.2014 for an amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- drawn on HDFC Bank Ltd. On presentation of the aforesaid cheque for encashment, the same was received back unpaid vide memo dated 09.12.2014 with the remarks "Accounts Closed". The accused was served with a legal notice dated 05.01.2015 within time but he failed to make the payment, leading to initiation of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. In the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed by the complainant, the petitioner-accused was summoned to face the trial. The evidence was led and ultimately, accused-petitioner was held guilty and accordingly, convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and it was also ordered that the accused will pay compensation under Section 357 of the Cr.P.C. to the tune of the cheque amount i.e. Rs. 4,00,000/- at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of the cheque till date i.e. 12.03.2018

4. That aggrieved against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, which came to be dismissed on 19.09.2023.

5. Still aggrieved, the present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner. Alongwith the present criminal revision, an application (CRM-50575-2023) under Section 320(6) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for permitting the compounding of the offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as the parties have amicably settled the dispute with intervention of respectable persons of the society. In terms of the compromise deed dated 28.11.2003 (Annexure P-1) the petitioner-accused has made a payment of Rs. 5,75,000/- in cash as lump sum payment towards both the dishonoured cheques i.e. Cheque No.908894 dated 23.09.2014 and Cheque No.569423 dated 16.09.2014. It would be relevant to mention here that a reading of Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 320 Cr.P.C. would show that where a settlement has been effected, the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded on account of the fact that a mutual compromise has been effected between the parties.

6. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 alongwith the learned State counsel for respondent No.2 contend that as the matter has been settled between the parties, they have no objection if the prayer made in the application for compounding the offence under Section 138 N.I. Act is allowed and the petitioner is acquitted of the charges framed against him.

7. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

8. This Hon'ble Court in 'Ramesh Chander v. State of Haryana and another, 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 245' held as under:-

    "4. As per the provisions of Section 147 of the Act, the offence under Section 138 is compoundabl

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top