SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2356

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KARAMJIT SINGH, J.
Gyano & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
FAO-5842 of 2014
Decided On : 23-11-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. S.K. Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel; For the Respondents

Absence of a train ticket does not negate a claim for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act if the deceased is proven to be a bona fide passenger.

Headnote:(A) Railways Act, 1989 - Section 124A - Claim for compensation - The deceased fell from a running train and died; Tribunal dismissed the claim citing absence of a valid train ticket - The court held that mere absence of a ticket does not negate the claim of being a bona fide passenger, reaffirming principles from Union of India v. Rina Devi (2019) 3 SCC 572. (Paras 9, 16, 18)

(B) Burden of Proof - Initial burden lies on the claimant to establish facts surrounding the incident; once established, the burden shifts to the Railways to refute the claim. (Para 16)

Facts of the case:
The deceased was traveling to meet relatives when he fell from the train and died. The appellants claimed compensation, which was initially denied by the Tribunal due to the absence of a ticket.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the deceased was indeed a bona fide passenger despite the absence of a ticket and ruled in favor of the appellants.

Issues: The main issues were whether the deceased was a bona fide passenger and if the incident fell within the ambit of Section 124A of the Railways Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that absence of a ticket does not negate the claim of being a bona fide passenger and emphasized the importance of establishing the facts of the case.

Result: Appeal allowed; compensation of Rs. 4 lakh awarded with interest.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Karamjit Singh, J.

This appeal has been filed by the appellants against judgment dated 24.1.2014 passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (in short, "the Tribunal") whereby the claim application filed by the appellants for grant of compensation was dismissed.

2. The facts of the case of the appellants in nutshell are that appellant No.1 is widow while appellants No.2 to 4 are sons of deceased- Bishamber; that on 15.7.2010, deceased-Bishamber had gone to Ballabgarh for purchase of buffaloes. On the next day, the deceased went to village Nekpur, Tehsil Ballabgarh to meet his cousin Bedan and thereafter, the deceased along with Bedan reached New Town, Faridabad Railway Station to board a train to go to Palwal to meet his other relations. The deceased purchased train ticket and boarded EMU Train No. SNP 4. There was heavy rush in the train and during the said journey, the deceased fell from the running train just near Ballabgarh Railway Station and sustained multiple injuries and died at the spot. On receiving the information, the officials of GRP inspected the spot and conducted inquest proceedings and the post mortem examination of the dead body was conducted on 17.7.2010. Later on, the appellants came to know about the said incident on 24.7.2010 and appellant No.2 went to Police Station GRP Faridabad and they identified the dead body from the photographs to be that of Bishamber. However, the train ticket was misplaced at the time of the aforesaid untoward incident.

3. The claim petition was contested by the respondent by filing written statement wherein it was pleaded that no such untoward incident had taken place as has been alleged by the appellants. It was further pleaded that in the absence of any travelling ticket, the deceased could not be termed as a bonafide passenger. The other averments of the claim application were denied and it was pleaded that the claim sought by the appellants be dismissed.

4. On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed :-

    1. Whether the deceased was a bonafide passenger at the time of incident?

    2. Whether the incident is covered within ambit of Section 123 (c)(2) read with Section 124A of the Railways Act?

    3. Whether the applicants are the sole dependants of the deceased?

    4. Relief.

5. Appellant No.2-Kiran Pal appeared in the witness box as AW1 and also examined AW2 Bedan. The appellants also placed on record inquest report dated 16.7.2010 Ex.A1, copy of station memo dated 16.7.2010 Ex.A2, death report dated 16.7.2010 Ex.A3, brief history of the case prepared by GRP with regard to site plan and photographs Ex.A5 and Ex.A6, the application moved by GRP, Faridabad with request for post- mortem examination Ex.A7, post mortem report dated 17.7.2010 Ex.A8, receipt regarding handing over of the dead body Ex.A10, request dated 19.7.2010 made by GRP, Faridabad to Municipal Corporation to perform last rites of the dead body Ex.A11.

6. On the other hand, the respondents examined RW1-O.V.Singh, Dy. SS/Ballabgarh, who at the relevant time, was Station Master, Ballabgarh. The respondent also filed report of DRM.

7. After hearing counsel for the parties, the Tribunal dismissed the claim application filed by the appellants vide impugned order and while doing so, gave findings with regard to issues No.1 and 2 against the appellants. Being aggrieved, the appellants have filed the present appeal.

8. I have heard the counsel for the parties.

9. Counsel for the appellants has contended that from the perusal of testimony of AW1 and AW2 coupled with inquest report, post mortem report and the report of DRM, it stands proved that on the day of incident i.e. 16.7.2010, the deceased boarded a train from New Town, Faridabad Railway Station to go to Palwal after purchasing a travelling ticket and the same was lost at the time of the incident. He has further contended that during train journey from New Town, Faridabad Railway Station to Palwal, the deceased fell from a running train and di

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top