IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KARAMJIT SINGH, J.
Raja Kumar Bhagat – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-42329 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 28-03-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. recovery of opium and procedural issues. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenges to sampling procedure and request for bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's resistance to bail based on recovery amount. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's analysis of sample collection methods. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. length of custody and doubt on prosecution case. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. grant of bail ordered. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
Karamjit Singh, J.
The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.2 dated 6.1.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 18 , 25, 29 of NDPS Act at Police Station Cantt, Jalandhar City, District Jalandhar.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegations appearing on the record, 26 polythene bags each containing Opium were recovered from the stepney of the Tata Sumo No.JH 05 AP 8743 in which the petitioner, Krishna Rao and Poonam Devi Rao were traveling. He further submits that as per prosecution version, the aforesaid Opium on weighment came out to be 26 kg 110 grams. He further submits that it has also been recorded in the FIR that the said Opium weighing 26 kg 110 grams which was there in 26 polythene bags was collected in one plastic drum of blue colour and then the samples were separated and those samples were sent for analysis to the concerned Laboratory. He further contends that even in the reply filed by way of affidavit of Ravinder Singh, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sub Division V, Cantonment, Jalandhar on behalf of the State (in CRM-M-32287-2021), it has been specifically stated that 26 polythene bags containing Opium were recovered and on weighment, total Opium came out to be 26 kg 110 grams and the said Opium was put in blue colour drum and thereafter, the samples were separated.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid sampling procedure followed by the police was totally wrong and actually, the samples from each polythene bag should have been taken for the purpose of their chemical examination. He further submits that on this sole ground, the entire recovery proceedings stands vitiated. He further contends that even otherwise, the petitioner is in custody for the last about 2 years and 2 months and the trial is going at a snail's space and as such, prayer is made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner.
4. In support of his contentions, counsel for the petitioner referred to judgment dated 13.3.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1027 of 2015 titled Amani Fidel Chris v. Narcotics Control Bureau wherein Delhi High Court while dealing with a case under NDPS Act where samples were drawn after breaking small pieces from 8 polythene bags and the Investigating Officer prepared two samples of 25 grams each, observed that if it not practically possible to send the entire quantity, then sufficient quantity by way of samples from each of the packets of pieces recovered should be sent for chemical examination, otherwise the result thereon may be doubted.
5. The present petition is resisted by the State counsel who submits that the present case involves recovery of more than 26kg of Opium which was recovered from the vehicle in which the petitioner was traveling along with two other persons. State counsel further submits that the samples in this case were collected properly by the police officials in accordance with law and the said samples were sent to concerned Laboratory in sealed parcels and on examination, they were found to be that of Opium. He further submits that the trial is in progress and at this stage, no ground is made out to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. I have considered the submissions made by the counsel for the parties.
7. As per allegations appearing on the record, 26 polythene bags containing Opium were recovered from the vehicle in which the petitioner was traveling along with Krishna Rao and Poonam Devi Rao. From the perusal of the FIR as well as the reply filed by the State in the sh
All drugs shall be classified, carefully, weighed and sampled on spot of seizure.
The court ruled that the conditions for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied due to the serious nature of the offences and the substantial quantity of contraband involved.
Improper sample collection in drug cases violates mandatory guidelines, impacting the prosecution's case and justifying bail despite Section 37 restrictions.
The court emphasized that proper sampling procedures must be followed in drug cases, and long incarceration can justify bail despite stringent conditions under the NDPS Act.
Doctrine of beyond reasonable doubt is applicable in criminal matters.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the recovery of contraband from each accused should be considered individually, not collectively, and the categorization of the quantity of co....
Point of law: It cannot be ascertained beyond reasonable doubt that the other bags also contained contraband on the basis of presumption.
Improper evidence collection under NDPS Act can lead to bail eligibility despite serious charges, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures and the right to personal liberty.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.