SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2373

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KARAMJIT SINGH, J.
Raja Kumar Bhagat – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-42329 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 28-03-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. C.L.Pawar, Addl. AG, Punjab

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 18, 25, 29 - Grant of regular bail - Recovery of 26 kg 110 grams of Opium from vehicle - Sampling procedure not followed appropriately, leading to doubts on validity of the recovery - Parameters for bail under Section 37 satisfied due to prolonged custody and insufficient progress in trial. (Paras 2, 3, 7, 10)

(B) Bail - Principles governing bail in NDPS cases - The interest of justice requires that if proper procedure was not followed, the accused may be entitled to bail - Indications of no future offenses provide grounds for bail. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested with two others after 26 polythene bags containing Opium were recovered from their vehicle. Counsel argued that the sampling procedure was flawed, thus invalidating the recovery.

Findings of Court:
The sampling was not conducted according to legal standards, leading to doubt regarding the integrity of the samples collected.

Issues: The primary issues were the adequacy of the sampling procedure and the justification for the ongoing detention of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of following established protocols for sample collection and noted that failure might compromise the integrity of the case, thus affecting the bail considerations.

Result: Petition allowed; petitioner granted bail.

Table of Content
1. recovery of opium and procedural issues. (Para 1 , 2)
2. challenges to sampling procedure and request for bail. (Para 3 , 4)
3. state's resistance to bail based on recovery amount. (Para 5)
4. court's analysis of sample collection methods. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. length of custody and doubt on prosecution case. (Para 9 , 10)
6. grant of bail ordered. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Karamjit Singh, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.2 dated 6.1.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 18 , 25, 29 of NDPS Act at Police Station Cantt, Jalandhar City, District Jalandhar.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegations appearing on the record, 26 polythene bags each containing Opium were recovered from the stepney of the Tata Sumo No.JH 05 AP 8743 in which the petitioner, Krishna Rao and Poonam Devi Rao were traveling. He further submits that as per prosecution version, the aforesaid Opium on weighment came out to be 26 kg 110 grams. He further submits that it has also been recorded in the FIR that the said Opium weighing 26 kg 110 grams which was there in 26 polythene bags was collected in one plastic drum of blue colour and then the samples were separated and those samples were sent for analysis to the concerned Laboratory. He further contends that even in the reply filed by way of affidavit of Ravinder Singh, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sub Division V, Cantonment, Jalandhar on behalf of the State (in CRM-M-32287-2021), it has been specifically stated that 26 polythene bags containing Opium were recovered and on weighment, total Opium came out to be 26 kg 110 grams and the said Opium was put in blue colour drum and thereafter, the samples were separated.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid sampling procedure followed by the police was totally wrong and actually, the samples from each polythene bag should have been taken for the purpose of their chemical examination. He further submits that on this sole ground, the entire recovery proceedings stands vitiated. He further contends that even otherwise, the petitioner is in custody for the last about 2 years and 2 months and the trial is going at a snail's space and as such, prayer is made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner.

4. In support of his contentions, counsel for the petitioner referred to judgment dated 13.3.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1027 of 2015 titled Amani Fidel Chris v. Narcotics Control Bureau wherein Delhi High Court while dealing with a case under NDPS Act where samples were drawn after breaking small pieces from 8 polythene bags and the Investigating Officer prepared two samples of 25 grams each, observed that if it not practically possible to send the entire quantity, then sufficient quantity by way of samples from each of the packets of pieces recovered should be sent for chemical examination, otherwise the result thereon may be doubted.

5. The present petition is resisted by the State counsel who submits that the present case involves recovery of more than 26kg of Opium which was recovered from the vehicle in which the petitioner was traveling along with two other persons. State counsel further submits that the samples in this case were collected properly by the police officials in accordance with law and the said samples were sent to concerned Laboratory in sealed parcels and on examination, they were found to be that of Opium. He further submits that the trial is in progress and at this stage, no ground is made out to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. I have considered the submissions made by the counsel for the parties.

7. As per allegations appearing on the record, 26 polythene bags containing Opium were recovered from the vehicle in which the petitioner was traveling along with Krishna Rao and Poonam Devi Rao. From the perusal of the FIR as well as the reply filed by the State in the sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top