IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI, JJ.
Jagir Singh @ Johny – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRA-D NO. 105-DB of 2017
Decided On : 17-07-2023
JUDGMENT
Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J
The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 8.9.2016 and the order of sentence of even date passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Exclusive Court, Amritsar whereby, the appellant has been convicted for committing an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. Moreover, he has been sentenced to pay a fine amount comprised in a sum of Rs.10,000/-, and, in default whereof he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 6 months.
Factual Matrix
2. The prosecution story as unfolded from a statement which was recorded by Ashwani Kumar, who was lateron examined as PW1, at Police Station Chheherata, Amritsar. The statement which unfolded the prosecution version reads as under:-
3. On the basis of the above statement, an FIR No. 279 was registered on 24.11.2015 under Section 302 IPC against the appellant-accused Jagir Singh @ Johny, who is the husband of deceased-Suman. After recording the statement, Inspector/SHO Arun Sharma (PW11) went at the spot. He reached on the first floor of the house, where the dead body of Suman was lying and prepared the site-plan (Ex.P8) at the spot. A wale (chhuni) was tied around the neck of the deceased, which was removed and got converted into parcel duly sealed with the seal of 'AS' and taken into possession vide recovery memo Ex.PW6/A. The inquest proceeding was also carried out at the spot by the Inspector/SHO in the presence of one Johny (PW2) son of Amar Nath and Vijay Kumar. Thereafter the photographer was called at the spot and the photographs of the place of occurrence were clicked. The statements of other witnesses, who were present at the spot were recorded under the provisions of Section 174 Cr.P.C. On the next day i.e. 25.11.2015, the post-mo
In cases of unnatural death in matrimonial homes, the husband bears the burden of proof to explain the circumstances, and conviction can be based on credible eyewitness testimony.
The reliability of a child witness's evidence, the need for corroboration, and the significance of medical evidence in establishing guilt in a murder case.
The court upheld the conviction for murder, emphasizing that fear-induced delays in FIR registration and eyewitness testimony were credible despite long lapses in time.
Delay in FIR and pre-FIR inquest not vitiating trial absent prejudice; reliable natural witness testimony, corroborated by medical/weapon evidence, suffices for murder conviction despite inconclusive....
In criminal cases, consistent and credible evidence is essential; discrepancies and reliance on related witnesses can undermine the prosecution's case and result in acquittal.
As the medical evidence does not support the manner of assault on the victim. It also lends support to the defence case, such a wound could not be possible looking to the position of the victim & per....
Conviction based on unreliable eyewitness testimony due to delays and contradictions cannot be sustained, emphasizing the need for credible evidence in criminal cases.
Point of law: Conviction set aside – Murder case - duty is cast upon the prosecution to produce worthwhile evidence to establish the guilt against the accused beyond all reasonable doubt.
Murder – Non-examination of Doctor who conducted autopsy on dead body of deceased and who prepared post-mortem report is not fatal to case of prosecution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.