Neetu vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 3460

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3460

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Neetu – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ranjit Singh Ghuman, Advocate and Mrs. Shashi Ghuman, Advocate; For the Appellant-Appellant in both the cases.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Deepender Singh, Advocate for Respondents No. 2 and 3 in both the cases.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

The applicant/appellant has filed the instant criminal appeal and application for seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgement of acquittal passed by the learned trial court in case FIR No. 50 dated 7.2.2009, under Sections 323 , 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Gurgaon and Criminal Complaint No. 60 of 2014, filed under Sections 376 , 323, 506, 34 IPC, titled as 'Neetu v. Satish etc.', vide which respondents-accused were acquitted of the charges framed against them.

Factual Matrix

2. The case of the prosecution unfolded on a statement made by the prosecutrix on 7.2.2009, (the identity of the prosecutrix has been withheld in view of the provisions of Section 228(A) of IPC hereinafter to refer as the prosecutrix) to the police that her father is living separately from them for the last 15 years and she has been living with her siblings and mother Ramwati and her mother Ramwati is working as a house maid. On that day, at around 2.00 PM, when she was alone at her home, Satish son of Khushi Ram, Tejpal son of Dil Khush entered in her house. Satish grappled her and gagged her mouth and then Tejpal had ravished her. She tried to raise ala