KULDEEP TIWARI
Arun Nanda – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
Through the instant petition, as cast under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners crave for the hereinafter extracted reliefs:-
Factual Matrix
2. The genesis of the present petition can be traced to a complaint (Annexure P-1), as made by complainant/respondent No.2, wherein, besides levelling allegations against the petitioners, allegations have also been levelled against one Rakesh Kumar son of Wazir Chand. Therefore, the contents of the complaint (Annexure P-1), are extracted hereinafter:-
Judicial decisions must be reasoned to ensure accountability and transparency; failure to provide reasons constitutes a denial of justice.
The court emphasized the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction and the requirement for a prima facie case to be made out for summoning the accused.
No doubt, while exercising the power under Section 319 of Cr.P.C., Court has to exercise the said power with due care and caution and not to exercise the said power in a routine course but the materi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the revision petition was not barred by limitation, and the trial Court's order dropping the proceedings against the respondents was not chall....
At the stage of summoning, the Magistrate is not required to consider the defense version or evaluate the merits of the materials or evidence of the complainant.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court must adhere to the specific mode of action and the statutory provisions in criminal law, including the requirement to condone delay ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.