Vijay Singh vs Gram Panchayat - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 756

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 756

SURESHWAR THAKUR, LALIT BATRA
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gram Panchayat – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate for the appellants (in RSA-1009-2019).
Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate for the appellants (in RSA-1569-2019).
For the Respondent: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate for Respondent-Gram Panchayat (in both the appeals)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.

Since both the appeals (supra), involve common questions of law, besides, when the verdict challenged in both the appeals is common to both, thus, they are amenable to be decided through a common order.

2. In civil suit no. 22 of 2014, an affirmative decree was made by the learned Civil Judge concerned, on 10.07.2015, vis-a-vis the relief claimed in the said suit, inasmuch as, for a decree of mandatory and permanent injunction being made, to the effect that the revenue entries in column No. 4 and column No. 5 of jamabandis, of the disputed lands situated within the revenue estate of Village Assan Kalan, Tehsil and District Panipat, are liable to be corrected, in favour of the plaintiffs, given they being the owners and co-sharers vis-a-vis the disputed lands, besides qua the espoused consequential relief of mandatory injunction directing defendants No. 1 to 3 to enter the names of the plaintiffs in equal shares in column No. 4 and column No. 5 of the jamabandis qua the suit property. Moreover, also qua the asking of relief, to the effect that the recording of mutation No.1184 dated 02.09.1956, and, on 27.12.1961, thus depicting the father of the plai