Back
SURESHWAR THAKUR, LALIT BATRA
Imrat (Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Gurgaon Division, Gurgaon – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.
Since both the writ petitions make a challenge to common thereto impugned orders of 01.06.2006 (Annexure P-13), and of 07.03.2006 (Annexure P-12) respectively passed by the Commissioner, and, by the Collector concerned, wherebys became quashed the assigning of a declaratory decree vis-a-vis the present petitioners by the Assistant Collector concerned, through the latter making Annexure P-11, besides when the contempt petition also arises from the orders passed in writ petitions (supra), therefore all the (supra), petitions are amenable to be decided through a common verdict.
2. For the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CWP- 12493-2006.
Facts
3. It is pleaded in the writ petition, that the suit lands in the jamabandis respectively enclosed with the writ petition, as Annexure P-1 to P-3, and, which appertain respectively to the years 1907-08, 1938-39 and 1945-46, thus in the column of ownership thereof, rather being stated to become owned by Shamlat Deh Hasab Hissa Malkiat and, with the column of cultivation thereof, making speakings qua an entry of Makbooja Maalkan thus existing therein. Therefore, it is contended that the disputed lands were
The court affirmed that lands classified as Shamlat Deh cannot be claimed for exclusive ownership without sufficient evidence of independent cultivation prior to 1950.
The classification of lands as shamlat patti is upheld; civil courts lack jurisdiction over ownership disputes regarding shamlat deh lands under the Act.
The court upheld that concurrent findings by lower authorities on land ownership are not to be disturbed unless proven perverse, emphasizing the need for solid evidence in claims over ancestral versu....
The court affirmed the authority of the Gram Panchayat to auction disputed land, ruling that the petitioner's claims of ownership were undermined by his own leasing actions and lack of evidence.
The court affirmed that land classified as 'Banjar Qadim' does not vest in the Gram Panchayat unless proven otherwise, and the presumption of truth in revenue records was upheld, leading to the dismi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
