IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE, JJ.
Dharminder Singh @ Dhanna – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent
CRA-D NO. 243 of 2022(O&M)
Decided On : 26-05-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations and facts regarding narcotics case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments against bail due to complicity. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis on evidentiary concerns. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. legal interpretation of bail conditions under ndps. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT
Mrs. Lisa Gill, J
Appellant is aggrieved of rejection of his petition for bail pending trial in FIR No.RC-03/2020/NIA/DLI dated 22.01.2020 under Sections 13 /17 of UA(P) Act, and Sections 21 /29 of NDPS Act, Police Station NIA, New Delhi and FIR No.75 dated 31.05.2019 under Sections 21 /25/27A/29 of NDPS Act, Police Station Tarsika, Amritsar.
2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of this matter are that, FIR No.75 dated 31.05.2019 under Sections 21 /25/27A/29 of NDPS Act was registered at Police Station Tarsika, Amritsar with three persons as accused, namely, Jajbir Singh Samra, Harpreet Singh @ Happy and Varinder Singh Chahal. Said FIR was registered with the allegations that police party headed by ASI Manjit Singh of Police Station Tarsika laid a Naka on the basis of secret information. A Hyundai Verna car bearing registration No. PB46-U-4761 coming from Sarao side was signalled to stop, but driver of the car tried to flee. The car was, however, apprehended. 400 gms of heroin from Jajbir Singh Samra, 90 gms heroin from Harpreet Singh @ Happy and 10 gms heroin from Varinder Singh Chahal was recovered. Cash amount of Rs. 1,20,000/- alongwith other material was also recovered. Nirmal Singh @ Neeldhari was arrested during course of investigation by the State Special Operation Cell, Amritsar and on the basis of disclosure by Nirmal Singh @ Neeldhari, one Satpal Singh and Hira Lal were arrested for mobilizing proceeds from drug trafficking.
3. Investigation of the matter was handed over to National Investigating Agency (NIA) by the Central Government, New Delhi vide order dated 20.01.2020. Matter was re-registered as NIA case. Present appellant was nominated as an accused on account of disclosure statement of Jajbir Singh Samra and Harpreet Singh @ Happy who were apprehended on the spot. The appellant is alleged to be the owner of Maruti Ritz car bearing registration No.PB10-CY-6061 which was used in drug trafficking. It is alleged that the appellant used to purchase drugs from co-accused Jajbir Singh Samra (arrested on the spot) for self consumption as well as for sale of the same. As per prosecution case, the accused persons are involved in running a narco-terror network which was controlled by one Harmeet Singh @ PHD, a self-styled chief of Khalistan Liberation Force. The network is stated to be comprised of a number of elements involved in buying/selling of heroin and channelizing the proceeds through non-banking channel of Hawala operators to Dubai and Pakistan. Insofar as allegations against the present appellant are concerned, it is alleged that he used to procure drugs from accused Jajbir Singh Samra and vehicle bearing registration No.PB10-CY-6061 owned by the appellant was actively used by him and accused Harpreet Singh @ Happy in the said activities. It is on the disclosure statement of Harpreet Singh @ Happy that Maruti Ritz car bearing registration No.PB10-CY-6061, belonging to the appellant, was recovered from the bushes near Jandiala canal bridge (pul nahar).
4. Challan was presented against the accused persons including the appellant. Charges against the accused including the appellant were framed on 06.09.2021. Appellant has been alleged of being part of a larger conspiracy for trade of heroin in India and for using its proceeds to further the activities of banned Khalistan Liberation Force and reviving the wave of terrorism in the State of Punjab. Appellant has also been charged under Sections 25 /29/27/27A of the NDPS Act. Appellant's application seeking bail pending trial was dismissed by the Special Judge, NIA, Punjab, SAS Nagar (Mohali) vide impugned orde
Mohd. Muslim @ Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi)
AI
The need for substantial probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and the deleterious impact of narcotic drugs on society.
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
Points of law : Grant or rejection of bail under the NDPS Act is governed by Section 37 of the Act. Under Section 37 of the Act, the court before granting bail has to be satisfied that there are reas....
Bail may be granted if the accused is named in a co-accused's disclosure statement without corroborative evidence, especially after substantial custody time, aligning with the right to a speedy trial....
The court's decision emphasized the serious nature of the offenses, the organized network involved, and the prima facie evidence supporting the role of each accused.
The court established that for bail under the NDPS Act, there must be corroborative evidence beyond confessions to justify detention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.