IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, SUKHVINDER KAUR, JJ.
State of Punjab & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Gulzar Singh & Ors. – Respondents
LPA-411 of 2017 (O&M)
Decided On : 10-02-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis of appeal and initial writ petition filed (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rules on promotion and seniority defined (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. promotion eligibility queries (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. learned single judge's findings (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. principle of law on impossibility and duties (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. final decision on appeal (Para 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.
This Letters Patent Appeal is filed challenging judgment dt.29.09.2016 in CWP-9073-2015.
2. The respondents No.1 to 19 had filed the said Writ Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to quash orders dt.14.10.2013 and 05.12.2013 passed by appellant No.2 and had also sought a direction to the appellants to promote respondents No.1 to 19 as Senior Assistants as per their seniority from the date their juniors had been promoted as Senior Assistants along with all consequential benefits.
3. The promotion to the post of Senior Assistant is provided under Rule 8(1)(d)(ii) of the Punjab Police Clerical Services (State Service Class III) Rules, 1960 [hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'].
4. Rule 8(1)(d) of the Rules states:
"In the case of Assistants Class-I
(i) by direct appointment; or
(ii) by promotion from amongst Clerks with 5 years minimum service and junior-scale stenographers with 5 years minimum service including one year's minimum experience as Clerk;
(iii) by selection from among officials employed in departments of Government other than the Police Department."
(Emphasis Supplied)
5. Rule 11 of the Rules deals with the Seniority of members of the Service and states:
"Seniority of members of the Service:-
Subject to the provision of Punjab Services Integration Rules, 1957 the seniority Inter-se of members of the service holding the same class of posts shall be determined by the dates of their joining appointments to such posts in the Service.
Provided that in the case of members appointed directly the order of merit determined by the Commission or the Board, as the case may be, shall not be disturbed;-
Provided further that in the case of two or more members joining their appointments in the same class of posts on the same date, their seniority shall be determined as follows:-
(a) a member recruited by direct appointment shall be senior to a member recruited otherwise;
(b) a member recruited by promotion shall be senior to a member recruited by transfer;
(c) in case of members, who are recruited by promotion or transfer, seniority shall be determined according to the seniority of such members in the appointments from which they were promoted or transferred;
(d) in the case of members recruited by transfer from different cadres, their seniority shall be determined accordingly to pay, preference being given to a member who was drawing a higher rate of pay in his previous appointment; and if the rates of pay drawn be also the same, then by their length of service, and in case their lengths of service also happen to be the same, an older member shall be senior to a younger member.
Note:- (1) The posts of clerks, steno-typist and Junior Scale Stenographers shall be treated as the 'same class of posts' for the purpose of preparing a joint seniority list for making promotions to higher posts, their seniority Inter-se reckoning from their dates of joining the posts.Whenever a Steno-typist is promoted as Junior-Scale Stenographer involving the supersession of the some other Steno-typist senior to him, the senior to him, the seniority of the promoted official on the joint seniority list vis-a-vis the other clerks and stenographers would remain undisturbed except that the superseded Steno-typist to the Steno-typists as the case may be, would be brought down on the joint seniority list so as to rank junior to the Steno-typist who has been found suitable for promotion.
(2) Similarly, the posts of Senior- scale Stenographer, Assistant and Head Clerks should be interchangeable and treated, as the 'same class of posts' for the purposes of preparing a joint-seniority
AI
The court established that promotions must adhere to seniority rules based on continuous service, invalidating promotions conducted without a proper inter-se seniority list.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to recruitment rules and cautioned against flouting them, stating that deliberate deviation from the rules could lead to wrongful benefits and departme....
AMENDMENT TO RULE 14(V) OF THE RAJASTHAN DISTRICT COURTS MINISTERIAL ESTABLISHMENT RULES, 1986, DOES NOT EXCLUDE STENOGRAPHER GRADE-I AND PERSONAL ASSISTANT CUM EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT FROM THE ZONE OF C....
Eligible junior's vested right to promotion precedes seniors' conditional consideration under relaxatory note in recruitment rules.
The right to promotion and seniority under the Special Rules must be upheld, ensuring eligible candidates are prioritized over direct recruits.
Rule 14(v) of Rules of 1986, pre-amendment and post amendment, reads as Promotion.
Promotion - whether or not the persons are in service for requisite length to acquire the graduation qualification is not a relevant consideration. What is relevant is that they must acquire the qual....
The court held that promotions must comply with the established All India seniority instead of regional seniority, ruling unjust promotions based on outdated practices must be corrected.
Seniority assigned to any employee could not be changed after a lapse of 7 years, though even on merit it was found that seniority of the petitioner therein had correctly been fixed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.