SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3361

M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, SUKHVINDER KAUR
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Chander Pal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arun Benwial, DAG, Haryana; For the Appellant

Table of Content
1. facts leading to the acquittal appeal (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. state's contention on trial court's errors (Para 8)
3. issue of victim's age under pocso act (Para 9 , 18)
4. weight of documentary evidence for age determination (Para 10)
5. evidence value of school admission records (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. contradictory evidence affecting credibility of witness (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
7. elements of consent and voluntary actions in alleged crime (Para 19)
8. prosecution's burden of proof on sexual assault claims (Para 20)
9. prosecutrix's inconsistent statements impacting case credibility (Para 21 , 22)
10. evidence evaluation and corroboration necessity in rape cases (Para 25)
11. conclusion dismissing the appeal for lack of merit (Para 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT

Sukhvinder Kaur, J.

The appellant-State of Haryana has preferred the instant application under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal against judgment dated 16.12.2020, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sirsa, vide which respondent-accused Chander Pal has been acquitted.

2. The facts, as per record, are that the complainant is resident of Village Bakerianwali, District Sirsa. The age of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top