SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3376

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANISHA BATRA, J.
Amarjit Singh Doad – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-40175 of 2020 (O&M)
Decided On : 22-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Gurmohan Singh Bedi, Advocate; For the Appellant
Ms. Himani Arora, AAG, Punjab
Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the complainant

Proclamation proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. must adhere to strict procedural requirements, including prior issuance of arrest warrants and proper publication, to avoid nullity.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 82 - Quashing of order declaring petitioner as proclaimed person - Proclamation proceedings not conducted in accordance with Section 82 - Petitioner was in Spain, not properly served - Order quashed. (Paras 3, 13)

(B) Proclamation for absconding person - Requirements for issuance and publication of proclamation discussed - Prior issuance of warrant and proper publication mandatory. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was declared a proclaimed person while residing in Spain and had not received any notice or summons. The complainant had no objection to quashing the order. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The impugned order suffers from material illegalities and is quashed, with a directive for the petitioner to surrender within four weeks. (Paras 7, 13)

Issues: The main issues were the validity of the proclamation proceedings and proper service of notice under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (Paras 10, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the proclamation must be issued only after due procedure, including proper publication as per Section 82, is followed. (Paras 10, 12)

Result: Petition allowed; order quashed.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Manisha Batra, J. (Oral)

CRM-49232-2023

Prayer in this application is for preponing the date of hearing of the main petition, which is fixed for 09.01.2024.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The main petition is preponed and taken up today itself.

2. CRM-M-40175-2020 (O&M)

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of order dated 16.07.2018, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hoshiarpur in case titled as State v. Amarjit Singh Doad, arising out of FIR No. 88 dated 22.08.2017 registered under Sections 406 and 498-A of the IPC at Police Station Mehtiana, District Hoshiarpur, whereby he had been declared a proclaimed person.

3. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of the present petition are that the petitioner had been nominated as an accused in the aforementioned case and vide order dated 16.07.2018, he was declared a proclaimed person, though he was in Spain at that time. He had never received any notice/summons or warrants at his place of residence in Spain. Neither he was served through Indian Embassy located in Spain. He had continuously remained at Spain with effect from 19.02.2016. The proclamation proceedings were not conducted in accordance with the procedure laid down under Section 82 Cr.P.C. Therefore, prayer has been made by the petitioner for setting aside the impugned order.

4. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that a compromise has been arrived at between the petitioner and complainant. A separate petition for quashing of FIR has also been filed by the petitioner, in which the factum of compromise has been brought on record. He has submitted that the complainant has no objection if the order, declaring the petitioner a proclaimed person, is set aside.

5. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has argued that the petitioner had intentionally and will fully avoided the service of notice/execution of warrants and had absconded in order to face trial and had been declared a proclaimed person after following due procedure of law. Therefore, it is urged that the petition is liable to be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and have perused the record accordingly.

7. On giving due deliberation to the contentions as raised by learned counsel for the parties and on overall perusal of the orders passed by the trial Court from the date of initiating proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. as against the petitioner till the date of declaring him a proclaimed offender, I am of the considered opinion that the impugned order dated 17.07.2018 suffers from material illegalities and is liable to be quashed with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

8. At the outset, it would be relevant to refer to the provision of Section 82 Cr.P.C., which provides for publication of proclamation against the person absconding. It reads as under:

    "82. Proclamation for person absconding. -

    (1) If any Court has reason to believe (whether after taking evidence or not) that any person against whom a warrant has been issued by it has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed, such Court may publish a written proclamation requiring him to appear at a specified place and at a specified time not less than thirty days from the date of publishing such proclamation.

    (2) The proclamation shall be published as follows:-

    (i) (a) it shall be publicly read in some conspicuous place of the town or village in which such person ordinarily resides;

    (b) it shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which such person ordinarily resides or to some conspicuous place of such town or village;

    (c) a copy thereof shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the Court-house;

    (ii) the Court may also, if it thinks fit, direct a copy of the proclamation to be published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in w

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon Back to top