SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1068

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANISHA BATRA, J.
Sonu – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRM-M NO. 58815 of 2023
Decided On : 18-01-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Bhisham Kumar Majoka, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

The court granted bail based on the lack of supporting evidence from the victim and her friend, and the lengthy detention of the petitioner.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail - Petition for regular bail filed by the petitioner in a case involving serious allegations of rape and criminal intimidation - The trial court had dismissed the bail application, but the petitioner was ultimately granted bail due to lack of supporting evidence from the victim and her friend. (Paras 1, 4, 7)

(B) Acquittal of Co-Accused - The acquittal of co-accused does not automatically benefit the petitioner, as the allegations against them were not the same. (Paras 4, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of raping the victim on 04.09.2015, but both the victim and her friend did not support the prosecution's case against him during the trial. (Paras 2, 4)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the evidence presented did not support the allegations against the petitioner, and his continued detention would not serve any useful purpose. (Paras 6, 7)

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail despite serious allegations against him. (Paras 4, 7)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the lack of corroborative evidence from the victim and her friend warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing that further detention would not be justified. (Paras 6, 7)

Result: Petition allowed; the petitioner granted bail.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Manisha Batra, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.8 dated 07.09.2015 registered under Section 509, 506 of IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Sections 120B and 216 of IPC added later on) at Police Station Women, Sector- 51, Gurugram, District Gurugram.

2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on 07.09.2015 on the basis of written complaint filed by the victim 'M' alleging therein that she along with her friend 'ME' (name withheld) used to go to a Marshal Art Academy run by one 'G' at a neighbouring village. On 04.09.2015 also she had gone to the Academy with her friend 'ME' and was sitting in the office of 'G' for the purpose of filling some form when the petitioner barged therein along with 7-8 youths and after entering therein, he opened an assault upon 'G' who while saying that he was doing something wrong with the girls. The victim and her friend tried to convince them that it was not so but he did not listen and all of them kept on assaulting 'G' and he was made to flee from his office. The petitioner had also spread a rumour in the village of the victim that something wrong was being done. Thereafter, the petitioner forced the victim and her friend to sit on his motorcycle on the pretext that he would drop them at their houses and otherwise threatened to defame them. The victim alleged that the petitioner also told her that he loved her and would kill her as well as her friend if they did not sit on his motorcycle. By saying so and frightening them, he boarded them on their motorcycle. She further alleged that while her friend 'ME' was dropped at her village but instead of taking the victim towards her house, the petitioner forcibly took her to some field wherein he committed rape upon her while pressing her mouth and thereafter dropped her at her village. Even thereafter, he kept on sending threatening messages and objectionable SMS to her on her mobile and out of fear, the victim did not disclose anything to anyone. She mustered courage to disclose about the incident to her parents only on 06.09.2015. She also took the name of the co-accused Kartikey. A case was registered. The victim was medically examined during investigation. Offences under Sections 120B and 216 of IPC were added as the petitioner could not be arrested and his mother was alleged of shielding him and avoiding his apprehension. The co-accused Kartikey was also arrested. Both of them faced trial and have since been acquitted of the charges as framed against them.

3. It has come on record that the present petitioner was declared a proclaimed person/offender as proceedings under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. were initiated against him. He could be arrested only on 09.06.2023. After completion of investigation against him, he is presently facing trial before the learned Fast Track Court, Gurugram. He had moved an application for grant of regular bail before the concerned Court which had been dismissed vide order dated 06.10.2023.

4. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner on the grounds and it is argued by his counsel that he has been falsely implicated in this case. The co-accused have been acquitted as the version of the prosecutrix and her friend had not been believed to be true by the Court who had tried the co-accused. Challan against him has also been presented. Neither the victim nor her friend 'ME' have supported the case of the prosecution and have not implicated him in commission of the offences for which he is facing trial. He is in custody since long. The trial is likely to take time. No useful purpose would be served by keeping him custody. Therefore, it is argued that he deserves to be given concession of bail.

5. The bail petition has been resisted by the State in terms of the status report. Learned State counse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top