SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3335

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RITU BAHRI, MANISHA BATRA, JJ.
Bunty Khanna – Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO.9506 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 05-05-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Nikhil Goyal, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal, Senior Standing Counsel; For the Respondents

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 148A (d) and Section 148 - Reassessment proceedings - The petitioner sought to quash an order under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 due to an unprocessed application for surrender of a PAN. The respondents stated that two PANs were issued and the petitioner was using one unlawfully for undisclosed transactions. The case was reopened based on allegations of escaped income over Rs.50 Lakhs. (Paras 1, 3, 4, 5, 6)

(B) Jurisdiction of High Court - The Supreme Court held that the Income Tax Act provides a complete machinery for assessment and reassessment, preventing abandonment of this process in favor of High Court intervention. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was a regular income tax assessee who mistakenly held two PANs, claiming to have surrendered one of them. The noticing of the ongoing assessment for undisclosed transactions prompted reassessment proceedings.

Findings of Court:
Dismissing the petition, the court found no merit in the claim that the PAN surrender application was unaddressed, as reassessment on escapement of income was justified.

Issues: The legitimacy of the reassessment proceedings based on the undisclosed PAN usage and the propriety of High Court intervention were central concerns.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the Income Tax Act's structures must be followed before seeking High Court intervention, emphasizing established judicial precedents preventing premature or unwarranted judicial interference.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. details of the case and pan issues. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding premature approach. (Para 3)
3. need for re-examination of undisclosed income. (Para 4)
4. legal grounds for case reopening. (Para 5)
5. final judgment and dismissal of petition. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Ritu Bahri, J.

CM-12740-CWP-2022

Reply, filed on behalf of respondent No.2, is taken on record.

Misc. application stands allowed accordingly.

CWP No.9506 of 2022

Petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 01.04.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed under section 148A (d) of the INCOME TAX ACT and notice dated 01.04.2022 (Annexure P-8) under section 148 of the INCOME TAX ACT on the ground that the respondents have not processed the application for surrender of PAN filed by the petitioner on 26.03.2014 (Annexure P-2).

2. As per petitioner, he is a regular income tax assessee and was allotted PAN ABJPK3615M by the Income Tax Department. However, due to some correction in PAN data undertaken by the petitioner, two PANs were issued. The second PAN was AFKPK8017L. The petitioner, thereafter, started filing his return of income on the PAN AKFPK8017L. After coming to know that petitioner was holding two PAN cards, he voluntarily filed an application dated 26.03.2014 (Annexure P-2) for surrender of PAN ABJPK3615M before respondent No.1. Keeping in view the above fact, petitioner received a letter dated 30.01.2016 (Annexure P-3) stating that return with respect to PAN ABJPK3615M had not been filed. Thereafter, the petitioner made a request on Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS) before respondent No.3 on 14.08.2016 (Annexure P-4). The petitioner was under bonafide belief that application for surrender of PAN had been processed by respondent Nos.1 and 3. On 21.03.2022, the petitioner was issued a notice (Annexure P-5) under Section 148 A (b) of the INCOME TAX ACT to initiate re-assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2015-16. To the said notice, petitioner filed his reply (Annexure P-6) clarifying the fact that the aforesaid PAN had already been surrendered by him. Despite the clarification given by the petitioner vide his reply (Annexure P-6), respondent No.1 proceeded to conduct the assessment on the surrendered PAN by passing an order under Section 148 A (d) of the Act (Annexure P-7). Thereafter, a notice dated 01.04.2022 (Annexure P-8) under Section 148 of the Act was also issued to the petitioner. Hence, the present petition.

3. Upon notice, reply dated 02.08.2022 on behalf of respondent No.2, has been filed, wherein it has been stated that the petitioner has approached this Court at a pre-mature stage, as the proceedings initiated are yet to be completed by the adjudicating authority. On merits, it is stated that the petitioner was holding two PANs i.e. AKFPK8017L and ABJPK3615M during the financial year 2014-2015 and he had filed his income tax return under the PAN AKFPK8017L. Although he is claiming to have intimated the department for surrender of PAN ABJPK3615M vide letter dated 26.03.2014, but the fact of the matter is that he was using this PAN during the financial year 2014-2015 with the Bank of Baroda and was maintaining the bank account No.26190500000034, attached with PAN ABJPK3615M. As per information available with the department, the assessee had made transactions of Rs.1,31,62,300/- in this bank account. The second pan was being intentionally used by the assessee for depositing unexplained cash generated by him. He had not declared the given bank account in his books. In this backdrop, case of the petitioner was re-opened on the basis of the information available on database of the department under PAN ABJPK3615M and the re-assessment is to be completed on the same PAN of the assessee. Copies of the information available on the Insight Portal and undisclosed bank account are attached as Annexures R-1 and R-2. It is further stated that petitioner is maintaining three b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top