IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RITU BAHRI, MANISHA BATRA, JJ.
M/s. Amar Flour Mills – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO. 8548 of 2008
Decided On : 08-02-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. registration and processing of wheat by petitioner (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. exemption from market fees under rule 30(13) (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. previous court rulings support exemption (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's final decision to allow writ (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 29.05.2007 (P-2) and notice dated 25.04.2008 (P-4) issued by respondent no. 3.
2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner-unit is engaged in the processing of agriculture products such like wheat, maze etc. for manufacturing wheat flour and its secondary products. The petitioner unit got registered as small scale unit with the Director of Industries, Punjab. As per certificate issued by the Directorate of Industries, the unit is producing wheat flour, mill atta, suzi and bran etc. (The Petitioner unit also obtained license in Form-B from the concerned Secretary of Respondent Market Committee which is valid. As per the license, a dealer as defined under the Punjab Agricultural Produce markets Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as the 'Act 1961') is authorized to purchase, sale, store and to do its processing).
3. The petitioner/mill had been purchasing wheat from the state of Punjab and outside the state of Punjab to meet its requirements for producing the finish goods, since inception. The registration of the unit was necessary earlier but no license was thereafter required for running the processing unit in the State of Punjab to install and run flour mill.
4. The Petitioner was purchasing wheat from the area of Market Committee, Banur and its surroundings and from outside the state of Punjab as well. Thereafter, the wheat purchased is taken to the mill premises for processing the same for manufacturing wheat flour and its secondary products.
5. The petitioner-Unit is governed by the provisions of Act 1961, the dealers and licensees are defined in Section 2 (f) and 2 (hh) respectively. The State of Punjab for the implementation of the provisions of the Act framed the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (General) Rules, 1962 (for short 'Rules 1962'). Rule 29 of Rules 1962 speaks about the levy and collection of fees on sale and purchase of market produce whereas Rule 30 speaks about the exemption for payment of fees. Rule 30 of Rules 1962 reads as under:-
6. Vide notification dated 11.09.2001, Sub Rule 13 was added (P- 1). After issuance of the notification dated 11.09.2001, respondent No. 2 had written letter dated 18.09.2001 to all the Market Committees in the State of Punjab informing them that the Government had decided not to levy any market fee on wheat and maize which were to be used by processing units in the State of Punjab.
7. Despite the above notification dated 11.09.2001, the Market Committee sent a notice dated 29.05.2007 demanding necessary market fees and RDF to the Market Committee,
(1) It is obligation of importer to realise market fee from purchaser and pay the same to Market Committee.(2) It is sale within market area that attracts levy of market fee and not first purchase th....
Industrial concerns are not liable to pay market fees on agricultural produce brought into the market area for processing and manufacturing under section 28 of the Act, 1963, provided that they have ....
Market fees can only be levied if agricultural produce is sold or purchased within the notified market area, as per Section 12(1) of the A.P. Markets Act.
Market Committees have the implied authority to levy and assess fees under the M.P. Agricultural Produce Markets Act despite the absence of explicit procedural rules.
Guidelines for Price Support Scheme – guidelines issued by the Government of India to refuse to comply with its obligation to pay the market fees to the petitioner
The court emphasized the necessity of complying with procedural requirements and principles of natural justice in administrative assessments, ruling that unauthorized assessments contravene statutory....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.