SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3059

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Atul Paints – Appellant
Versus
Additional District Magistrate, Ludhiana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Er. Sandeep Suri, Advocate; For the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has approached this court for seeking directions to the respondent to decide the complaint dated 03.12.2022, (Annexure P- 10) filed under Section 340 Cr.P.C. against the authorised officer of M/s ASREC (India) Ltd. for concealing material facts regarding various court litigations and F.I.R. to District Magistrate, Ludhiana and obtained permissions fraudulently under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act from District Magistrate, Ludhiana vide Application/ MISAL No. 843/2022 dated 19.09.2022 and permission granted vide Endorsement No. 6552- 55/Peshi/ADC dated 27.10.2022.

2. It has been averred in the present petition that M/s ASREC (India) Ltd. issued a demand notice dated 11.04.2022 for Rs.26,96,23,532.70 informing regarding a notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act which was issued to petitioner on 04.05.2016. (ANNEXURE P-1). Petitioner later raised objections regarding denying service of notice dated 04.05.2016 issued by M/s ASREC (India) Ltd, but without considering the facts M/s ASREC (India) Ltd.'s authorized officer on 05.07.2022 issued notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. Aggrieved by the notice of symbolic possession

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top