SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 903

VIKAS BAHL
Sunny Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Garvit Mittal, Advocate; For the Petitioner
For the Respondent: Mr. Samarth Sagar, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)

CM-9591-CWP-2024

This is an application filed under Section 151 of CPC for revival of the main petition.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner has submitted that the earlier counsel did not appear in the matter and the matter was disposed of in his absence. It is further submitted that the petitioner, after having knowledge of the said order passed, had engaged the present counsel and has prayed that the order dated 02.04.2024 be recalled and the main case be reheard.

3. In view of the request made by learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, the present application is allowed and the order dated 02.04.2024 is recalled and the main case is taken up on Board today for final disposal.

Main case

4. Present Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ, order or direction restraining the respondents to continue with departmental inquiry by order No. 17128-34, dated 17.06.2019 (Annexure P-3) during the pendency of the criminal trial in case FIR No. 211 dated 13.06.2019 registered under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(1) (w) (xii) and 3 (2) (v) S.C/S.T. Act, 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top