Back
VIKAS BAHL
Chanchal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Vikas Bahl, J. (ORAL)
This is a civil writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 13.10.2023 (Annexure P-16) passed by respondent no.3.
2. The case of the petitioner briefly stated is that vide advertisement no.3 dated 16.04.2018, the respondent-Commission had advertised 5000 posts of male Constable and in pursuance of the same, the petitioner had applied for the post of male constable, but was not shown in the list of successful candidates. It is the case of the petitioner that in the meanwhile the petitioner was appointed to the post of Constable IRB and joined on 06.03.2019 and completed his training as Male Constable IRB from 11.03.2019 to 09.01.2020. It is further the case of the petitioner that cut off marks of the last candidate in the Male Constable (GD) under BCB category were 56.20 and the petitioner was shown to have been given 51.20 marks and was not awarded 5 marks under the socio-economic criteria and thereafter, the petitioner had filed CWP-17349-2020 which was disposed of by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.10.2020 direc
Basic training for Male Constables is mandatory under the Haryana Police Act and cannot be waived based on prior training in a different cadre.
Rule 19.14 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, which provides for the selection of Constables for the Lower School Course on the basis of a competitive test, is not violative of Article 16 of the Const....
The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with government orders and fair treatment in recruitment processes, ruling against arbitrary actions by authorities.
Mere pendency of a criminal case does not disqualify a candidate for public service if the allegations are trivial and disclosed during the application process.
The eligibility of a candidate can be verified at any stage of the recruitment process, but after the completion of the process and issuance of the appointment letter, the candidate cannot be denied ....
Serving personnel cannot claim ex-serviceman quota appointment without completing full service term and timely reporting despite multiple opportunities.
Illegal appointments cannot be perpetuated, and mere continuation in service does not confer rights; reinstatement is not permissible if the appointment was void ab initio.
Court directs committee to review constable-to-head constable promotions flawed by high merit-test quota, irregularity, stagnation, and sub-cadre discrimination, ensuring fair avenues despite state p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
