Satish Kumar Garg vs Vasudev - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 3186

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3186

SANJAY VASHISTH
Satish Kumar Garg – Appellant
Versus
Vasudev – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate; For the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, J. (Oral)

Present regular second appeal has been filed by the appellants (defendants) against the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below, whereby, suit for permanent injunction was decreed in favour of the plaintiff (respondent herein).

2. As per the facts pleaded in the plaint, plaintiff along with other co-sharers are joint owners in possession of the agricultural land comprised in Khewat No.46, Khatoni No.53, Rect. No.13, Killa No.10(8-16), 11(6-18), 12(1-14), 19(6-13), 21(8-0), 22(7-2), Kita 6 measuring 39 Kanals 3 marlas situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Kanuka Tehsil and District Rewari vide Jamabandi for the year 2001-2002.

3. The appellants (defendants herein) are owners in possession of Khewat No.48, Khatoni No.55, Rect. No.14, Killa No.15/2/2 (1-17), 16/2 (8-0), 17/2(5-18), 23(8-0), 24(8-0), 25(8-0), Kita 6 measuring 39 Kanals 15 Marlas its 1/48th share i.e. 17 Marlas and Khewat No.39, Khatoni no.46, Rect. No.13, Killa no.8/2/2(0-12), 9/2/1(1-3), 9/2/3(2-0), Kita 3 measuring 3 kanals 15 Marlas its 1/24th share and Khewat No.45, Khatoni no.52, Rect no.14, Killa no.8(8-0), 9(8-0), 14/1 (7-18), Kita 3 measuring 23 Kanals 18 Marla