Back
NIDHI GUPTA
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Somti Devi/Cross Objectors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay in filing cross objections. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. common disposal of appeal and cross objections arises from tribunal award. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. tribunal's findings on accident and awarded compensation to claimants. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. argument regarding dependency of claimants and compensation entitlements. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. dispute on income assessment for compensation and claimant dependency. (Para 9 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. legal interpretations of dependency for compensation entitlement. (Para 13 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. nature of compensation under motor vehicles act and judicial considerations. (Para 18 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. final determination of compensation amount to claimant and appeal outcomes. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT
Ms. Nidhi Gupta, J.
CM 25581-CII/2019
Since there is delay of 21 days in re-filing the Cross Objections, aforesaid application has been filed seeking condonation of said delay. The application is supported by affidavit dated 3.10.2019 of the counsel for the Cross-Objectors.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and delay of 21 days in filing the Cross Objections is condoned.
Main Appeal and Cross
The Motor Vehicles Act requires consideration of all dependents in compensation claims following a vehicular death, affirming broader interpretative criteria for determining legal representatives.
Legal representatives, even if not dependents, are entitled to compensation on account of loss of estate under S.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Legal representatives can claim compensation for loss to estate under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, even if not dependents.
Legal representatives can claim compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act regardless of dependency status, emphasizing a broader interpretation of dependency in joint family contexts.
Legal representatives, including married daughters and major sons, are entitled to claim compensation under the M.V. Act, emphasizing a broad interpretation of dependency and representation.
The main legal point established is the entitlement of legal representatives to claim compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, irrespective of dependency.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
