SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1171

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J.
Mohit @ Situ - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana - Respondent
CRM-M No. 63167 of 2023
Decided On : 16-11-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Vikas Gulia Adv., Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal Adv., Mr. Trishanjali Sharma DAG, Haryana.

The court granted bail due to lack of direct evidence against the petitioners and prolonged custody without trial, emphasizing the importance of fair trial rights.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 302, 201, 34 - Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27 - Grant of bail - The case relies on circumstantial evidence with no direct attribution of involvement to the petitioners - Material witnesses declared hostile, and the complainant has absconded - Petitioners have been in custody for extended periods without trial conclusion. (Paras 1, 2, 8)

(B) Bail - The court emphasized that the absence of incriminating evidence against the petitioners and the prolonged custody without trial necessitates the grant of bail. (Paras 2, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought bail in a murder case based on circumstantial evidence, with the complainant having fled abroad and material witnesses not supporting the prosecution.

Findings of Court:
The petitions for bail were allowed due to the lack of incriminating evidence and the prolonged custody of the petitioners.

Issues: The main issues were the lack of direct evidence against the petitioners and the status of the complainant's testimony.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of specific attribution of guilt and the hostile nature of material witnesses warranted the grant of bail.

Result: Petitions allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.)

This order shall dispose of the above-mentioned petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for grant of regular bail to the petitioners, as they arise out of same FIR i.e. FIR No.27 dated 23.05.2021 under Sections 120-B, 302, 201, 34 of the IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station GRP Sonipat.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that a perusal of the FIR in question makes it abundantly clear that the instant case hinges solely on circumstantial evidence. It has been submitted that as per the allegations levelled in the FIR by the complainant (nephew of deceased Naresh), he received a telephonic call from PW-1 Krishan that his uncle Naresh (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) had been shot at by some person. Learned counsel submit that even as per the allegations levelled in the FIR in question, no attribution had been made to either of the petitioners of being present at the scene of the crime much less of having fired towards the deceased. Rather, PW-1 Krishan had not mentioned the name of any assailant while informing the complainant about the alleged crime. Learned counsel have submitted that a false and fabricated version having been brought forth finds further credence from the fact that PW-1 Krishan, who purportedly informed the complainant about the crime in question, while stepping into the witness box, had not supported the case of the prosecution as a result of which he was declared hostile. Learned counsel have also submitted that all the material witnesses except for complainant-Rahul had been examined before the trial Court and had not supported the case of the prosecution as a result of which they were all declared hostile. In support, learned counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to Annexures P-3 to P-6, which are the testimonies of all the material witnesses. Learned counsel have further submitted that petitioner-Sanjay has been in custody since 03.05.2021, whereas petitioner-Mohit has been in custody since 02.07.2021, however, the trial has not yet concluded because complainant-Rahul has been repeatedly absenting himself before the trial Court. It has been submitted that the complainant has since fled away to USA and gained entry through illegal means and hence, he cannot also be examined through video conferencing as his exact location in USA is unknown. Learned counsel have, therefore, prayed that since all the material witnesses stand examined and there is no specific attribution qua both the petitioners with respect to the fatal injuries sustained by the deceased, they be extended the concession o bail.

3. Per contra, learned State counsel while opposing the prayer and submissions made by the counsel opposite has not been able to dispute the custody period of both the petitioners; she has also not been able to dispute the stage of trial. On instructions, learned State counsel has conceded that all the material witnesses in the present case stand examined and have been declared hostile during trial. However, learned State counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to the allegations levelled in the FIR, which has been annexed as Annexure P-1 and stands reproduced hereinunder:-

    “Statement of Rahul s/o Dalbir Singh, Jat, r/o village Karewari, PS Mohana, caste District Sonepat, age about 27 yeatrs, 10+2 pass, mobile no. 9050717338, stated that I am resident of above said address and driving private tempo. That on 22.05.2021, in the evening, I along with Vishal s/o Satbir r/o Karewari went to village Chitana for withdrawing of money from ATM. That at around 7:20 PM, Krishan s/o Mehar Singh, r/ village Karewari informed Vishal on his mobile phone that Naresh s/o Sultan, r/o village Karewari, PS Mohana, District Sonepat, at present Sarpant of village Karewari, has been shot by someone near to railway fattak no, 25C, Karewari road and he is lying in injured condition. That Vishal informed me tha

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top