Vikram Alias Bikka vs State Of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1142

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Vikram Alias Bikka – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajesh Kumar Dhankhar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana

JUDGMENT :

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.

Petitioner is seeking the concession of regular bail in FIR No.309 dated 22.10.2023 under Sections 148, 149, 302, 120-B of the IPC registered at Police Station Siwani, District Bhiwani.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR (Annexure P-1) nor suspected of involvement at the time of its registration. The FIR, lodged by Anil Kumar, brother of deceased Vikram, states that upon learning of a quarrel involving the deceased and certain persons, the complainant rushed to the spot, but found only his injured brother, who was promptly taken to a hospital. On the way, the deceased, while still alive, named five individuals with whom he had prior enmity, alleging that they, along with two to three unidentified persons, had assaulted him with iron rods and sticks.

3. It is contended that the name of the petitioner does not find mention in this dying declaration of the deceased. It has been further argued by the learned counsel that the petitioner had no motive to harm the deceased, and if such motive existed, his name would have appeared in the statement of the deceased. It is also submitted that the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document