HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Amrik Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jannatpreet Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Harpreet Singh Brar, J.)
The present revision petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 29.07.2023 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gurdaspur, whereby half of the amount lying in the pension account of the petitioner, as on the date of passing of the impugned order, was ordered to be attached in order to recover the maintenance amount, which has fallen in arrears.
2. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent No.3 was solemnized on 31.03.2015 and two sons i.e. respondents No.1 & 2 were born out of the wedlock. However, soon after solemnisation of the marriage, matrimonial dispute ensued between the couple and the respondents filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) [now Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’)] seeking maintenance for themselves. Resultantly, the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.7,000/- per month to respondent No.3-wife and Rs.4,000/- per month to each of two minor sons as maintenance vide order dated 26.02.2016. Subsequently, upon non-payment of the maintenance amount, the respondents preferred an execution
Vimala (K.) Vs. Veeraswamy (K.)
Kirtikant D. Vadodaria Vs. State of Gujarat
Poongodi and another Vs. Thangavel
Smt. Kuldip Kaur Vs. Surinder Singh and Anr.
The Family Court can enforce maintenance orders through pension attachment, but recovery is limited to one year of arrears, emphasizing the social justice intent behind maintenance laws.
Limitation - Recovery of arrear maintenance - When main petition claiming arrear was pending and kept alive, filing of subsequent petition was only to specify exact amount accrued due upto date. Such....
A Civil Suit for recovery of maintenance, which acquires the character of a 'debt' once a final Order is made under Section 125 Cr.P.C, is maintainable.
Imprisonment for non-payment of maintenance under Section 125(3) of the Cr.P.C. serves as a mode of enforcement and does not discharge the underlying liability; the court can impose sentences for eac....
Issuance of arrest warrants for recovery of maintenance arrears is illegal; enforcement must comply with statutory provisions protecting individual dignity and liberty.
The obligation to maintain dependents is continuous and independent of other proceedings, rooted in social justice provisions protecting vulnerable individuals.
Maintenance orders can be executed in jurisdictions based on temporary residence, affirming a spouse's right to choose the execution venue under the Code's provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.