SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1194

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.
Paramjit Kaur @ Baby - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRR No. 2382 of 2018
ecided On : 01-10-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ravi Mahotra Adv., Mr. Karunesh Kaushal AAG, Punjab, Mr. J.S. Ghuman Adv.

The power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is extraordinary and should be exercised sparingly, requiring strong evidence against the accused.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 319 - Power to summon additional accused - The petitioner challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge setting aside the trial Court's dismissal of an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. - The trial Court found no merit in summoning the petitioner, while the revisional Court disagreed, leading to the present revision petition. (Paras 1, 2, 3, 6, 10)

(B) Discretionary Power - The Supreme Court has established that the power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is extraordinary and should be exercised sparingly, only in cases with strong evidence against a person, and not in a casual manner. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The respondent alleged that the petitioner and her husband took money under false pretenses to secure a job for the respondent's son in the Merchant Navy, but failed to deliver. The trial Court dismissed the application to summon the petitioner, leading to a revision by the respondent.

Findings of Court:
The revisional Court found the trial Court's order unsustainable and remanded the case for reconsideration of the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C.

Issues: The main issues were whether the trial Court erred in dismissing the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and the sufficiency of evidence against the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the principle that the power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. should be exercised with caution and only when there is substantial evidence against the accused.

Result: Petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.)

The petitioner has approached this Court impugning the order dated 09.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, whereby, order dated 13.11.2017 passed by learned JMIC, Jalandhar was set aside and trial Court was directed to pass a fresh order on the application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C.

2. Succinctly facts of the case are that respondent No.2 lodged an FIR with the Police on the allegations that he retired from Army and wanted his son Parminder Singh to be settled, who had passed 10+2. Lakhvir Singh @ Lakha was married in their village, hence, he was acquainted with him. Lakhvir Singh @ Lakha took his son Parminder Singh in confidence by alluring him to be appointed in Merchant Navy. On 16.06.2011, Lakhvir Singh @ Lakha and his wife Paramjit Kaur @ Baby came to his house and took Rs.3 lacs advance on the pretext of appointing his son in Merchant Navy. In all, he paid Rs.7,80,000/- to them. However, neither his son was appointed in Merchant Navy nor any money was returned to him. Thus, request was made to take legal action against both the accused. On completion of investigation, the Police found the allegations against the petitioner Paramjit Kaur @ Baby having been not substantiated and thus, filed the challan only against her husband Lakhvir Singh @ Lakha. On the framing of charges against co-accused Lakhvir Singh @ Lakha, trial commenced. During the trial the prosecution filed an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning petitioner Paramjit Singh @ Baby to face the trial alongwith co-accused. On hearing, the trial Court found no merit in the application and thus, dismissed the same vide order dated 13.11.2017. Aggrieved by the same, respondent No.2 filed a revision petition before learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, who after hearing both the sides, found the order passed by the trial Court to be unsustainable and thus, set aside the same with direction to the trial Court to pass a fresh order on the application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C., vide impugned order dated 09.05.2018. Hence, aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court by way of filing the present revision petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently submitted that the allegations made by respondent No.2-complainant are totally motivated and general in nature. It is submitted that the prosecution examined three witnesses i.e. complainant -Amrik Singh as PW-1, Pawandeep Kaur daughter of complainant as PW-2 and Kashmir Kaur wife of complainant as PW-3. It is submitted that during the investigation, the allegations made in the FIR against the petitioner could not be substantiated and thus, the petitioner was found innocent by the Investigating Agency. He submits that the prosecution filed an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning the petitioner, however, the same being without any merit was dismissed by the trial Court. He submits that however, learned revision Court has fallen in error in setting aside the well reasoned order passed by learned trial Court. He submits that as per the settled proposition of law, summoning under Section 319 Cr.P.C. cannot be in a casual or cavalier manner. He has submitted that the statutory power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is an extraordinary power, which is there to prevent the miscarriage of justice, however, learned revisional Court has failed to appreciate the same and also the law settled by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Hardeep Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, (2014) 3 SCC 92 and thus, passed the impugned order, which is unsustainable in the eyes of law and deserves to be set aside.

4. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has opposed the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He has submitted that respondent No.2 has made specific allegations against the petitioner and her husband. Both of them had allured the son of respondent No.2 for providing him job in Merchant Navy. It is submitted th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top