SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1195

PANKAJ JAIN
Ram Phal – Appellant
Versus
Inder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Singh Adv., Mr. Shivdeep Adv.

JUDGMENT :

(Pankaj Jain, J.)

Defendant is in second appeal. For convenience, parties hereinafter are referred to by their original position in the suit i.e. the appellant as defendant and respondent as the plaintiff.

2. Plaintiff filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 25.02.2015 claiming the defendant agreed to sell suit land as detailed in para No.1 of the plaint in his favour for valuable consideration of Rs.13,12,500/-. Out of total sale consideration, Rs.10 lakh was paid as earnest money. Rs.7,82,000/- was paid by way of cheque and Rs.2,18,000/- in cash. Both the parties agreed to get the sale deed executed on or before 24.11.2015. Plaintiff further claimed that on the appointed day i.e. 24.11.2015, plaintiff remained present in the office of Sub-Registrar with balance sale consideration and the expenses of registration. However, defendant failed to turn up. Suit was instituted on 22.03.2017.

3. Suit was contested by the defendant who denied execution of the agreement to sell. It was claimed that the agreement to sell is a result of fraud and forgery. Though receipt of amount by way of cheque was admitted, but receipt of cash amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top