Pawan vs State of Haryana - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1312

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1312

ANOOP CHITKARA
Pawan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties : Mr. Deepak Chaudhary Adv., Mr. Viney Phogat DAG, Haryana, Mr. Chand Ram Ola Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
177	12.07.2020	Agroha, District Hisar	147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 452, 365 IPC and 3 of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court in appeal under Section 14A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989, against impugned order dated 02.05.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar whereby his bail application was dismissed.

2. In paragraph 12 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:

“3. That brief facts of the case are that on 11.07.2020, an information was received in the Police Station through telephone from Control Room, Hisar to the effect that Dheera Ram, Suresh and Ferozi sons of Manphool, Rani wife of Suresh and Mamta wife of Dheera Ram are admitted in MAMC, Agroha in injured condition. On this, Sub Inspector Balwan alongwith other police officials reached at MAMC Agroha and collected ruqqa and M.L.R.s and soug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document