SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Pawan - Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana & Anr. - Respondent
CRA-S No. 2394 of 2024
Decided On : 20-11-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties : Mr. Deepak Chaudhary Adv., Mr. Viney Phogat DAG, Haryana, Mr. Chand Ram Ola Adv.

The court denied bail based on prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in serious crimes, emphasizing the need to uphold justice.

Headnote:(A) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989 - Section 14A(2) - Bail application - Dismissal of bail application by Additional Sessions Judge - Accused involved in serious allegations including murder and assault - No criminal antecedents claimed by accused - Court found prima facie evidence of involvement in the crime, justifying denial of bail. (Paras 1, 3, 10, 12)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 174 - Investigation conducted under Cr.P.C. - Post mortem report indicated cause of death due to blunt force injuries - Seriousness of allegations against accused highlighted. (Paras 7, 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused in a case involving serious charges including murder, arising from an incident where the deceased was attacked by multiple individuals, including the petitioner, leading to the death of Ferozi. The FIR was registered based on the statement of the complainant, Dheera Ram.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner’s involvement was evident from the allegations and the nature of the crime, which included the use of weapons and public assault.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner should be granted bail in light of serious allegations and evidence of involvement in the crime.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence presented indicated the petitioner’s active role in the crime, and granting bail would undermine the justice process.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

177

12.07.2020

Agroha, District Hisar

147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 452, 365 IPC and 3 of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court in appeal under Section 14A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989, against impugned order dated 02.05.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar whereby his bail application was dismissed.

2. In paragraph 12 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:

    “3. That brief facts of the case are that on 11.07.2020, an information was received in the Police Station through telephone from Control Room, Hisar to the effect that Dheera Ram, Suresh and Ferozi sons of Manphool, Rani wife of Suresh and Mamta wife of Dheera Ram are admitted in MAMC, Agroha in injured condition. On this, Sub Inspector Balwan alongwith other police officials reached at MAMC Agroha and collected ruqqa and M.L.R.s and sought the opinion of doctor regarding fitness of injured to make the statement but the doctor opined the patients unfit to make the statement. On 12.07.2020, a message regarding death of Ferozi was received. On this Inspector Gurmeet Singh alongwith other police officials reached at MAMC, Agroha and sought the opinion of doctor regarding fitness of injured to make the statement. Thereafter, Inspector Gurmeet Singh recorded the statement of Dheera Ram, who was declared fit to make the statement. Dheera Ram got his statement recorded in presence of his family members, wherein he alleged that “he is employed at Water Works. On 11.07.2020, at about 4.00 p.m., he was on duty near the house of Sarpanch of village Mothsara, where, Anmol son of Parveen and Pawan (petitioner-accused) son of Bajrang, residents of village Asrawan came on a motorcycle and started abusing him. They gave him slaps and fists blows. Upon hearing noise, number of persons gathered at the spot and on seeing them, both of them fled away on their motor cycle. He came back to his house and narrated incident to his family members. Thereafter, at about 5.30 p.m., when, they were present in their house, Anmol son of Parveen, Rahul son of Dharampal, Rakesh and Sunder sons of Jaina Ram Nai, Vishnu son of Om Parkash, Wazir son of Balwant, Sonu, Pawan (petitioner-accused) and Surnder @ Kalu sons of Bajrang, residents of Asrawan armed with lathi, danda and iron rods came to his house and started abusing them in the name of their caste. They forcibly entered into their house and dragged them out at the road. Thereafter they attacked upon them with lathi, danda and iron rods. When female members of his family tried to save them, accused also inflicted injuries to his (Dheera Ram) wife Mamta, sister-in-law Rani, his brother Suresh and Ferozi. In the meantime, his cousin Pardeep and Kuldeep came at the spot and on seeing them, accused ran away from the spot. The enmity behind the occurrence was that the accused used to consume liquor at the chowk of the village and he made complaint to media and police against them. All the injured were got admitted in the hospital by Pardeep. During treatment, Ferozi died on account of injuries sustained in the occurrence. A request for taking necessary action against the accused was made”. On the statement of complainant Dheera Ram, present case FIR was registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 365 and 452 IPC and Section 3 of SC & ST Act against total 9 accused persons ie (i). Anmol, (ii). Rahul, (iii). Rakesh, (iv). Sunder, (v) Vishnu, (vi) Wazir (vii) Sonu, (viii) Pawan and (ix) Surender @ Kalu at Police Station Agroha District Hisar and investigation was carried out.”

4. The petitioner’s counsel submits as follows:

    “4. That as per contents averments made i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top