SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 99

NIDHI GUPTA
Birdevinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parminder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ashok Bhardwaj
.

JUDGMENT :

Nidhi Gupta, J.

1. The contesting defendant No. 1 is in second appeal before this Court against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent No. 1, seeking a decree declaring the plaintiff and defendant No. 4 to be owners and in joint possession out of the estate of Bahal Singh S/o Bagga Singh to the extent of 1/5th share of the property as detailed in the plaint; and decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant No. 1 from alienating, mortgaging, disposing of in any manner any part of the suit property on the basis of impugned mutation, has been partly decreed by the learned trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 02.07.2018. The said decree was challenged by the defendant No. 1 before the learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur by way of Civil Appeal No. 331 of 21.07.2018 which was dismissed with costs vide judgment and decree dated 07.12.2022. Hence, the present second appeal.

2. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status before the learned trial Court i.e. the appellant as the ‘defendant No. 1; contesting respondent No. 1 as the ‘plaintiff’ and pro forma respond

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top