SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 2000

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Gian Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ram Dayal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) -

Appellants-defendants have preferred the present Regular Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 22.05.1993 passed in Civil Appeal No. 169 of 1993 whereby the Additional District Judge, Faridabad, has set aside the judgment and decree dated 16.05.1991 passed by the Court of Sh. Ashok Bhardwaj, HCS, Sub Judge First Class, Palwal, passed in Civil Suit No.963 of 27.09.1985 dismissing the suit.

2. Briefly summarized, the facts of the present case are that respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration and for possession as a consequential relief averring that Sh. Lohari son of Jugla son of Bhawani resident of Village Baghola was earlier owner in possession of the suit properties. The aforesaid Lohari died issueless and was succeeded by his widow Sompti. That Gunga father of the respondent-plaintiff and Lohari were the sons of Sh Jugla and were hence brothers. After the death of Sompti, respondent-plaintiff being the nearest heir of Lohari became owner of the suit properties left by Lohari and Sompti. It is further averred that one Mamraj father of appellants-defendant No. 1 and 2 was son of daughter of Jugla and sister of Gunga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top