Back
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Yatender Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28/30.09.2004 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohtak.
2. The FIR was registered on 29.09.2001, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the Additional Session Judge, Rohtak is dated 28/30.09.2004, the appeal was filed on 07.02.2005 and the matter is being taken up for hearing now i.e. after a period of more than 23 years from the date of registration of the FIR.
3. The facts of the prosecution case are that on 29.09.2001, a telephonic message was received from the police post (P.P) situated at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS /Medical College, Rohtak that a fight had taken place at PGIMS, Doctor's hostel. Thereafter Sub-Inspector (SI) Rajender Singh accompanied by Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) Rajender Singh, Emergency Head Constable (EHC) Mahender Singh, constable Rajiv and constable Virender went to the Doctor's hotel. PW Mohit Singla, complainant met him and got his statement Ex.PH recorded to the effect that after doing M.B.B.S, from PGIMS, Rohtak, he was doing internship and was residing in room No. 16. Dr. Har
The judgment underscores that a conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence must establish an unbroken chain of events leading to guilt, with comprehensive corroboration against multiple hypot....
Extra-judicial confessions require corroborative evidence to ensure reliability; circumstantial evidence must present a complete chain connecting the accused to the crime without reasonable doubt.
It is a settled legal proposition that conviction of a person accused of committing an offence, is generally based solely on evidence that is either oral or documentary, but in exceptional circumstan....
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, and extrajudicial confessions require corroboration to be reliable.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, and extrajudicial confessions require corroboration to be credible.
Value of evidence as to confession depends on reliability of witness who gives evidence.
The court ruled that weak circumstantial evidence and lack of motive cannot support a murder conviction, necessitating a complete chain of proof.
Criminal Law - Offence of Murder - Circumstantial evidence - It is now well-settled that with a view to base a conviction on circumstantial evidence, prosecution must establish all pieces of incrimin....
Provisions of Section 106 of Evidence Act itself are unambiguous and categoric in laying down that when any fact is especially within knowledge of a person, burden of proving that fact is upon him.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
