SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 119

VIKAS BAHL
Jiva Ram Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar Bansal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Achin Gupta, Karan Bansal

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J.

1. Present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 22.10.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bathinda whereby the application filed by the petitioner/defendant No. 2 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case, the prayers made in the suit are covered under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure and thus, the suit could have only been instituted either by the Advocate General or two or more persons having an interest in the trust and after having obtained the leave of the Court. It is further submitted that the present suit has neither been instituted by the Advocate General nor the leave of the court has been taken. It is argued that the impugned order dated 22.10.2024 vide which the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on the above said ground, has been dismissed is illegal and deserves to be set aside.

3. A perusal of the order dated 22.10.2024 would show that the trial Court had observed that in the present case, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top