SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 125

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sukhpreet Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Meghna Malik

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.

1. The present writ petition preferred by Union of India and the Railways assail the order passed by the CAT dated 25.10.2023, whereby the Tribunal allowed the OA of the applicant-respondent no. 1 and directed to consider her case for appointment on compassionate grounds within a period of three months.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners assails the order on the ground that adoption-deed executed cannot be said to be legal and valid in law as the same was registered on 02.06.2017 while the girl adopted was above 20 years of age. It is further submitted that the date mentioned in the adoption-deed of actual adoption having been done on 12.01.2010 cannot be believed as the certificate of 10th class of respondent no. 1 does not reflect the name of deceased employee-Vijay Kumar and rather names of the original parents have been mentioned.

3. Learned counsel has invited our attention to the said certificate issued by the Punjab School Education Board on 03.06.2013 in support of her contention.

4. We have considered the submissions.

5. The writ petition and the contention raised by the Railways are found to be wholly misconceived for the reasons as we

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top