Sanjay Singh @ Ajay vs State of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 116

HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Sanjay Singh @ Ajay – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. D.N. Ganeriwala Adv., Mr. Kanishth Ganeriwala Adv., Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj AAG, Haryana, Mr. Ranbir Singh S.I

Table of Content
1. case involves bail application under ndps act. (Para 1 , 3)
2. arguments regarding delay and nature of the petitioner’s involvement. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court emphasizes the need for timely trials and bail considerations. (Para 7 , 8)
4. rights under article 21 and protracted trial impact bail decision. (Para 9)
5. petitioner granted bail pending trial. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

Prayer in this 3rd petition filed under Section 483 of the BNSS , 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.10 dated 08.04.2023 registered under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short ‘the NDPS Act’) at Police Station GRP Sirsa, District GRP Ambala (wrongly mentioned “Khuian Sarwar, District Fazilka” in the prayer clause of the petition).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2nd petition seeking regular bail to the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 06.08.2024 and now, the instant 3rd petition has been filed on account of delay in conclusion of the trial and the petitioner is behind the bars for the last 01 year and 10 months and out of 10 PWs only 02 PWs have been examined.

3. As per