SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 71

SANJAY VASHISTH
Gagandeep @ Monti – Appellant
Versus
Sukhbir Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Ashwani Arora Adv., Mr. Om Pal Sharma Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay Vashisth, J.

This case is a locus classicus wherein the injured-victim has been deprived of just compensation for more than two decades (a total of more than 24 years), awarding of which is the primary objective of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Unfortunately, responsibility for such a delay cannot be fixed on anyone except our system, which requires introspection and self-assesment, to equip itself for making an early decision, especially in the cases which involves painful or sensitive subject matter.

2. Appellant-Gagandeep @ Monti (hereinafter referred to as ‘claimant’) was 16 years old on the worst day of his life i.e. on 18.06.2000, when he was hit by the driver of an offending truck bearing HR-37-A-0921, namely, Sukhbir Singh (respondent No.1), who was driving in a grossly rash and negligent manner. Respondent No.2-Subhash Kumar was the owner of the vehicle and respondent No.3 is the Insurance Company with which the said truck was insured. Though not much needs to be discussed but starting with summarized facts may help in advancing justice by taking a compassionate view while awarding the adequate and just amount of compensation, thus, the same are discussed he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top