Back
SANDEEP MOUDGIL
X (12562) – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for habeas corpus under article 226 (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. various hearings and hearings reveal abduction claims (Para 7 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's inquiry into the minor's status and abduction (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. minor's behavior changes favorably with family contact (Para 18 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. court declines habeas corpus petition and concludes case (Para 28 , 29) |
| 6. high court addresses flood of protection petitions (Para 30 , 31 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. consequences of inefficiency in handling petitions (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 39) |
| 8. emphasis on timely state response to protect constitutional rights. (Para 40) |
| 9. guidelines and procedures for handling runaway couple cases (Para 41 , 42 , 46) |
| 10. final directives for state compliance and procedural change (Para 49 , 50 , 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Moudgil, J.
The instant petition involves peculiar facts whereby jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the Writ of Habeas Corpus for a direction to the State through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Justice, Haryana along with Deputy Commissioner of Police, District Panchkula and Station House Officer, P
The court ruled that discrepancies in the age of a detenue based on multiple documents necessitate a proper mechanism for investigating claims of forced confinement, particularly where minors are inv....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to regular bail based on the nature of the accusation, evidence against the accused, their custody period, and parity with other co....
The court affirmed the constitutional duty of police to protect individuals from extra-legal threats, emphasizing the need for effective mechanisms to ensure safety for couples facing societal harass....
The court emphasized the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21, asserting protection for adults in a live-in relationship against familial threats, regardless of marriageable age.
The paramount consideration of the welfare of the minor and the applicability of the statutory framework provided by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015 and the Protection....
The fundamental right to seek protection of life and liberty extends to minors, and the court has a duty to ensure their welfare and safety.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
