SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 89

ALKA SARIN
Jasbir Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Balwinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arvind Kashyap Adv., Mr. G.N. Malik Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13.09.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fatehgarh Sahib vide which the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner Order 6 Rule XVII CPC for amendment of the plaint (wrongly referred to as written statement in the impugned order) was dismissed.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-petitioner herein filed a suit for possession of the property as mentioned in head note ‘A’ of the plaint from defendant-respondents No.2 and 3 and a suit for permanent injunction. It was averred in the plaint that property mentioned as ABCD in the site plan Annexure ‘X’ was meant for tying animals and house shown as EFGHIMJKL was a residential house of the plaintiff-petitioner. From this house, husband of the plaintiff-petitioner purchased EFGHML from Randhir Singh and Kuldeep Singh vide a registered sale deed dated 16.04.1984. It was further averred that husband of the plaintiff-petitioner opened a door from this property into the main house which was ancestral house and thus the sam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top