Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Vikram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks the setting aside of denial for the constable post. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on reliance on police rules and status at application time. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on application of rules and petitioner’s innocence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. condition of physical/mental fitness for the constable post. (Para 12) |
| 5. order to conduct fitness test and appointment directive. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders dated 11.04.2023 (Annexure P-16) and 08.02.2017 (Annexure P-13) whereby he has been denied post of Constable.
2. The petitioner pursuant to Advertisement dated 02.08.2008, filed application under SC Category on 05.09.2008. At the time of filing of application, no criminal case was pending against him. He came to be implicated in FIR No.125 dated 23.05.2010 registered under Sections 304 /34 of IPC at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala. The petitioner cleared written and physical test. The physical test was conducted on 02.07.2010 and interview was conducted on 15.07.2010. The list of sele
Employment eligibility should be evaluated based on rules in place during application, not amended rules enacted post-selection process.
The judgment established that the statutory rules governing appointment procedures must be followed strictly, and the acquittal of a candidate after the stage of consideration does not override the b....
Mere pendency of a criminal case does not disqualify a candidate for public service if the allegations are trivial and disclosed during the application process.
A candidate's non-involvement in a criminal case, confirmed by removal from the FIR, allows for consideration in the current recruitment process despite prior allegations.
The cancellation of a candidate's selection based solely on the registration of a criminal case, without evidence of complicity, is unjustified and reflects a lack of proper consideration of the fact....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
