SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J .

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant- Insurance company against the award dated 18.03.2025 passed in a claim petition filed under Section 163-A of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bathinda (for short, 'the Tribunal'), wherein the claim petition filed by the claimants was allowed and appellant-Insurance company was made liable to pay at first instance and recovery rights were granted to recover the same from respondent No.1 to 4 jointly and severally.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

2. Brief facts of the case are that that on 16.08.2017, Harmanpreet Singh, had gone to Rose Marry School, Balluana when he was coming back alongwith his colleagues namely Jagdeep Singh and Dharmpreet Singh on motor cycle being driven by Harmanpreet Singh and they were being followed by Jagjit Singh (claimant no. 2) father of Harmanpreet Singh, who (father) had gone to school to enquire about the study of Harmanpreet Singh. When they reached on main road, then bus no. PB-03AJ-6874 was coming from backside being driven by its driver respondent no. 1 in a rash and negligent manner without giving any horn/signal struck the motor cycle,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top