IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Kulwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J.
1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned orders issued vide letters dated 29.05.2025 and 17.06.2025 (Annexure P-5 & P-6, respectively) passed by respondent No.2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is mainly aggrieved by the action of the respondents in failing to fix the pension of the petitioner and to release the retiral dues thereof despite a lapse of period of ten years since his superannuation on 31.03.2024. Further still, the petitioner is equally aggrieved by impugned order dated 29.05.2025 passed by respondent No.2 thereby again directing the petitioner to approach respondent No.3 for the redressal of his grievance instead of doing the needful in terms of the directions issued by this Court on 02.05.2025 in CWP No.12295 of 2025. He further submits that the petitioner has rendered more than 36 years of service and his work and conduct always remained satisfactory and he has retired way back on 31.03.2024.
Similarly situated employees have already been granted the benefit of the pension with effect from th
D.K. Nakara and others vs. Union of India
Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Patiala vs. Mangal & Ors.
Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
Francis Coralie Mullin vs. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi
Pension is a vested right for services rendered, not a discretionary benefit; unjustified delays in disbursement violate fundamental rights, thereby mandating timely release of such dues.
Pension rights are vested and cannot be arbitrarily denied; disciplinary actions post-retirement must adhere to statutory limits prohibiting proceedings for incidents beyond four years.
Pensionary benefits are a fundamental right and cannot be withheld due to pending investigations without statutory backing, affirming they cannot be treated as discretionary payments.
Pension is a fundamental right and property under Article 300A, and cannot be withheld without statutory authority, regardless of pending vigilance proceedings.
non-payment of leave salary and pension to retired employees is deprivation of a citizen in right to property. Such deprivation is violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 and Cons....
Pension is a constitutional right and cannot be withheld without proper justification, even if a caste certificate is disputed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.