Sukhvinder Kaur vs State Of Haryana - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 243

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Sukhvinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryanas

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek life and liberty protection. (Para 2 , 3)
2. precedents cited for similar protective orders. (Para 4 , 5 , 10)
3. court emphasizes life and liberty rights. (Para 11 , 12)
4. protection must be assessed and provided. (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.

2. The petitioner no.1 is stated to have been born on 01.01.1987 and for this purpose, reference has been made to the Aadhaar card (Annexure P-1). The petitioner no.2 is stated to have been born on 01.01.1978 and for the said purpose, reference has been made to the Aadhaar card (Annexure P-2). It is stated that the petitioners are in a “Live in Relationship”. Petitioner No.1 had solemnized marriage with Meethu Ram (since deceased) and out of the said wedlock five daughter and one son was born. Petitioner No.2 is also married and he is residing separately from the last five years. And as such, the petitioner No.1 is in a ‘live-in-relationship’ with petitioner No.2.

3. Learned counsel for the petitio