Roshani vs State of Haryana - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 239

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 239

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Roshani – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Arjun Dhingra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate

Table of Content
1. legal protection exists for individuals in live-in relationships. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court recognizes the increasing acceptance of live-in relationships. (Para 10)
3. assessment of threat perception is crucial for legal protection. (Para 11 , 15)
4. legal provisions prioritize the protection of life and liberty above all. (Para 12 , 14)

JUDGMENT :

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of private respondent nos.4 to 10.

2. The petitioner no.1 is stated to have been born on 04.01.2006 and for this purpose, reference has been made to the Aadhaar card (Annexure P-1). The petitioner no.2 is stated to have been born on 01.01.2001 and for the said purpose, reference has been made to the Aadhaar card (Annexure P-2). It is stated that the petitioners are in a “Live in Relationship”. Petitioner No.1 had solemnized marriage with one Momin- respondent no.4. Petitioner No.2 is also married with respondent no.4 and had one son and one daughter who are residing with respondent no.4 (father).