Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Baljeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Registered Firm M/s Prem Chand Krishan Lal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's appeal against previous court rulings (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's arguments against plaintiff's claims (Para 4 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. trial court's findings and evidence presented (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 11) |
| 4. procedural errors noted and responsibilities outlined (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 5. court's reasoning on unrebutted evidence (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.
1. This is defendant’s appeal against the judgment and decree dated 22.05.2013, passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, allowing the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 16.12.2010, passed by the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guhla, vide which the suit for recovery filed by the plaintiff had been dismissed.
2. For the sake of convenience and clarity, parties shall be referred to as per their original status.
3. The plaintiff-firm M/s Prem Chand Krishan Lal filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,34,967/- with future interest @ 1.5% per month against the defendant Baljeet Singh. The case of the plaintiff was that the plaintiff-firm was running the business of commission agent at Grain Market, Cheeka and, therefore,
The court reinforced that the plaintiff bears the burden of proof in recovery suits, and the defendant's failure to produce evidence does not liberate the plaintiff from proving its case.
An acknowledgment of debt must be in writing and signed to extend the limitation period; unsigned entries are legally insufficient.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following proper procedures for proving evidence under the Evidence Act and the duty of the adjudicating authority to fully focus....
The absence of certification under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, does not render computer-generated ledger accounts inadmissible, and the non-examination of the person who made entrie....
The burden of proof lies on the party asserting a legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts. The plaintiff must prove the existence of the facts to establish the validity of an agr....
The court affirmed that documents not disclosed with the written statement in commercial cases cannot be admitted, but contradictory decisions on evidence closure were ruled unsustainable.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
