SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1391

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPAK GUPTA
Surinder Pal Singla – Appellant
Versus
Manju Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sukhdeep Singh

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for court fee refund denied. (Para 1)
2. reference to previous case law for court fee refund argument. (Para 3)
3. court finds no merit in petition based on execution facts. (Para 4 , 5)
4. legal provisions for court fee refund analyzed. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
5. no settlement took place; court fee refund not warranted. (Para 11 , 12)
6. petition dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

1. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 29.05.2024 (Annexure P4), whereby prayer for return of court fee has been declined by ld. Executing Court.

2.1 Suit for possession by way of specific performance of contract, filed by plaintiff-Sanjay Madan along with Surinder Pal Singla (now petitioner), was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 28.04.2022. Defendant (now respondent No.1) was directed to execute the sale deed of the suit property in favour of the petitioner after receiving the balance sale consideration within a period of one month. Petitioner was given liberty to seek the remedy before the Court for getting the sale deed executed, in case defendant-respondent refused to do so.

2.2. For implementation of the judgment and decre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top