Ram Chander vs Sube Singh - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 302

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 302

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUVIR SEHGAL
Ram Chander – Appellant
Versus
Sube Singh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Vijay Singh Kajla, Advocate

Table of Content
1. claim of exclusive property ownership and interference. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding evidence and possession. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court analysis on ownership legitimacy. (Para 7 , 8)
4. final dismissal of appeal confirmed. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

Suvir Sehgal, J.

Assailing the concurrent finding recorded by the two courts, appellant-plaintiff is before this Court by way of instant second appeal.

2. Claiming to be owner in exclusive possession of a residential plot measuring 450 square yards, plaintiff filed a suit for declaration to the effect that he is owner in possession and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in his peaceful possession and from alienating the suit property. Pleaded case of the plaintiff is that Sh. Karmu @ Karma, predecessor-in-interest of defendants No.1 to 10, was the owner in possession of 1/4th share in Khasra No. 246//23/2 in Khewat No.2900//2797 Khatauni No.3327 of Gair Mumkin land measuring 2 kanals 6 Marlas. He sold 1/4th share in the land measuring 400 square yards to the plaintiff @ Rs.35 per square yard in the year 1985 for a total consideration of Rs.14,000/-. Plaintiff claims that he purchased another

Click Here to Read the rest of this document