Satbir @ Satbir Singh vs Subhash Chand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2797

ARUN MONGA
Satbir @ Satbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advocate for appellants.

Table of Content
1. concurrent adverse findings in lower courts. (Para 2 , 3)
2. defendants' counters and property claims. (Para 4 , 5)
3. analysis of property ownership and possession. (Para 10)
4. no substantial grounds for appeal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. final decision dismissing the appeal. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Arun Monga J. (Oral)

For convenience, parties herein are addressed as per the recitals before learned trial Court.

2. Having suffered concurrent adverse findings by the two Courts below, appellant-defendants are in second appeal before this Court assailing learned trial Court judgment and decree dated 14.12.2019, as upheld by learned First Appellate Court vide its judgment and decree dated 20.01.2023, decreeing the suit of plaintiff-respondents for permanent injunction for restraining defendant-appellants from interfering in their peaceful settled possession over suit property.

3. Briefly stated, facts, as noticed by learned Courts, are as below:

3.1 Haryana Wakf Board is the owner of the suit property, which was leased out in favour of father of plaintiffs, namely, Late Sh. Tilu Ram S/o Roshan Lal & plaintiff No.1 jointly vide Lease order no.24/Lease-Urban/F n