SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 362

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
KIRTI SINGH
Jitender Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Seema – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Jagram Singh Cooner, Advocate

Table of Content
1. maintenance awarded under section 125 for dependents' support. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. maintenance serves social justice and economic balance. (Para 4 , 5)
3. supreme court case law informs maintenance principles. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court found no merit in the appeal; thus, it was dismissed. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

Kirti Singh, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been preferred against order dated 19.02.2025 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., whereby maintenance of Rs.3000/- per month each (total Rs.9,000/-) was awarded in favour the respondents Nos.2 to 4.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent No.1 was solemnised on 29.01.2007 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies at Chandigarh and out of the said wedlock three children respondent Nos.2 to 4 were born. A matrimonial dispute ensued between the couple and the respondents filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for seeking maintenance. The petitioner filed a reply and contested the claim made by the respondents. The learned Family Court vide order dated 19.02.2025 granted maintenance to the tun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top